首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Experimental evidence that novel land management interventions inspired by history enhance biodiversity
【24h】

Experimental evidence that novel land management interventions inspired by history enhance biodiversity

机译:实验证据表明,新的土地管理加强干预措施受到历史生物多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. To address biodiversity declines within semi-natural habitats, land management must cater for diverse taxonomic groups. Integrating our understanding of the ecological requirements of priority (rare, scarce or threatened) species through 'biodiversity auditing', with that of the intensity and complexity of historical land use, encourages novel forms of management. Experimental confirmation is needed to establish whether this enhances biodiversity conservation relative to routine management. 2. Biodiversity auditing and historical land use of dry-open terrestrial habitats in Breckland (Eastern England) both encourage management incorporating ground disturbance and spatio-temporal variability. To test biodiversity conservation outcomes, we developed forty 4-ha management complexes over three successive winters, of which 20 were shallow-cultivated (rotovation) and 20 deep-cultivated (ploughing), stratified across 3,850-ha of closed-sward dry grassland and lowland heathland (collectively 'dry grassland'). Complexes comprised four 1-ha subtreatments: repeat-cultivation, first-time cultivation, 1-year-old fallow and 2-year-old fallow. We examined responses of vascular plants; spiders; true bugs; ground, rove and 'other' beetles; bees and wasps; ants; and true flies on treatment complexes and twenty-one 4-ha untreated controls. Sampling gave 132,251 invertebrates from 877 species and 28,846 plant observations from 167 species. 3. Resampling and rarefaction analyses showed shallow- and deep-cultivation both doubled priority species richness (pooling subtreatments within complexes) compared to controls. Priority spider, ground beetle, other beetle and true bug richness were greater on both treatments than controls. Responses were strongest for those priority dry-open habitat associated invertebrates initially predicted (by biodiversity auditing) to benefit from heavy physical disturbance. 4. Assemblage composition (pooling non-priority and priority species) varied between
机译:1. 半自然栖息地,土地管理必须满足对不同的分类群。的生态需求的理解优先级(罕见,稀缺或威胁)的物种通过“生物多样性审计”,与历史土地利用强度和复杂性,鼓励小说形式的管理。建立所需实验确认这是否增强了保护生物多样性相对于日常管理。审计和dry-open的历史土地利用布雷克兰地方(东部陆地居住地英格兰)鼓励管理整合地面扰动和时空可变性。结果,我们开发了四十4-ha管理复合物在三个连续的冬天,其中20人shallow-cultivated(翻土)和20deep-cultivated(耕地),分层3850 - ha closed-sward干草原和低地的灌木丛(集体“干草原”)。复合物组成四个1公顷subtreatments:repeat-cultivation,初次种植,一岁的休闲和2岁的休耕。检查了维管植物的反应;真正的错误;和黄蜂;复合物和21 4-ha未经处理的控制。从877年抽样了132251无脊椎动物从167年28846植物物种和观察物种。显示浅和深栽都翻了一倍优先级物种丰富度(池subtreatments在复合物)相比,控制。蜘蛛、土鳖虫、其他甲虫和真正的bug丰富对治疗比控制。优先级dry-open栖息地有关无脊椎动物最初预测(通过生物多样性审计)受益于重物理干扰。(池非优先和重点物种)之间的不同

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号