...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Wild and domestic savanna herbivores increase smaller vertebrate diversity, but less than additively
【24h】

Wild and domestic savanna herbivores increase smaller vertebrate diversity, but less than additively

机译:野生和家养的热带稀树草原食草动物增加小型脊椎动物多样性,但不到分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1. Cattle and other livestock graze more than a quarter of the world's terrestrial area and are widely regarded to be drivers of global biodiversity declines. Studies often compare the effects of livestock presence/absence but, to our knowledge, no studies have tested for interactive effects between large wild herbivores and livestock at varying stocking rates on small-bodied wild vertebrates. 2. We investigated the effects of cattle stocking rates (none/moderate/high) on the diversity of wildlife 0.05–1,000 kg using camera traps at a long-term exclosure experiment within a semi-arid savanna ecosystem in central Kenya. In addition, by selectively excluding wild 'mesoherbivores' (50–1,000 kg) and 'megaherbivores' (>1,000 kg; elephant and giraffe), we tested whether the presence of these two wild herbivore guilds (collectively, 'larger wild herbivores') mediates the effect of cattle stocking rate on habitat use and diversity of 'smaller wildlife' (mammals ranging between 10 and 70 cm shoulder height and birds). 3. Our results show that cattle enhance alpha diversity of smaller wildlife (with or without larger wild herbivore presence) and of all wildlife 0.05–1,000 kg (with or without megaherbivore presence), by altering vegetation structure. However, for smaller wildlife, this effect is less pronounced in the presence of larger wild herbivores, which also shorten grass. In the absence of cattle, mesoherbivore-accessible sites showed higher alpha diversity of smaller wildlife than sites excluding mesoherbivores. 4. Smaller wildlife habitat use was increased by high cattle stocking rates and wild mesoherbivores more in the presence of the other. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our findings imply that grazing, whether by livestock or wildlife, can enhance local savanna wildlife diversity. The biodiversity benefits of localised increases in herbivory are likely to be due to shortened grass and associated visibility improvements (for predator avoidance/foraging). This su
机译:1. 世界陆地面积和广泛认为是司机的全球生物多样性下降。牲畜的影响存在/缺席,但我们知识,没有研究进行互动大型野生食草动物之间的影响牲畜在不同储存利率小的野生脊椎动物。牛放养率的影响(没有一个/中/高)对野生动物的多样性0.05 -1000公斤在长期使用相机陷阱在半干旱草原围地实验生态系统在肯尼亚中部。选择性地排除野生“mesoherbivores”(50 - 1000公斤)和“大型”(> 1000公斤;大象和长颈鹿),我们是否进行测试这两个野生食草动物公会的存在(总的来说,“更大的野生食草动物”)介导牛放养率对栖息地的影响使用和多样性的小型野生动物(哺乳动物介于10,70 cm的身高和肩膀上鸟类)。α多样性的小型野生动物(或没有更大的野生食草动物)和存在所有野生动物0.05 -1000公斤(有或没有megaherbivore存在),通过改变植被结构。的效果不太明显更大的野生食草动物,也缩短草。没有牛,mesoherbivore-accessible网站显示高α多样性比网站更小的野生动物不包括mesoherbivores。栖息地的使用增加了高牛长袜利率和野生mesoherbivores更多其他的存在。应用程序。通过家畜或野生动物,是否能提高当地草原野生动物的多样性。生物多样性局部增加的好处食草性可能是由于缩短了草(和相关的可见性的改进避免捕食者/觅食)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号