...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Estimate of satellite-derived cloud optical thickness and effective radius errors and their effect on computed domain-averaged irradiances
【24h】

Estimate of satellite-derived cloud optical thickness and effective radius errors and their effect on computed domain-averaged irradiances

机译:的估计采用卫星云光学厚度和有效半径和他们的错误影响计算domain-averaged辐照度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The process of retrieving cloud optical thickness and effective radius from radiances measured by satellite instruments is simulated to determine the error in both the retrieved properties and in the irradiances computed with them. The radiances at 0.64 μm and 3.7 μm are computed for three cloud fields (stratus, stratocumulus, and cumulus) generated by large eddy simulation models. When overcast pixels are assumed and the horizontal flux is neglected in the retrieval process, the error in the domain-averaged retrieved optical thickness from nadir is 1% to -32% (1% to -27%) and the error in the retrieved effective radius is 0% to 67% (0% to 63%) for the solar zenith angle of 30° (50°). Using the radiance averaged over a 1 km size pixel also introduces error in the optical thickness because of the nonlinear relation between the reflected radiance and optical thickness. Both optical thickness and effective radius errors increase with increasing horizontal inhomogeneity. When the 0.64 μm albedo is computed with the independent column approximation using retrieved properties from nadir (oblique) view for a solar zenith angle of 50°, the error is ?0.3% to 14% (?5% to ?30%) relative to the albedo from 3-D radiative transfer computations with the true cloud properties. The albedo error occurs even though the radiance at one angle is forced to agree because a plane parallel cloud with a single value of optical thickness and effective radius cannot consistently match the radiance angular distribution. In addition, the error in the retrieved cloud properties contributes to the albedo error. When albedos computed with cloud properties derived from nadir and oblique views are averaged, the albedo error can partially cancel. The absolute error in the narrowband 0.64 μm (3.7 μm) albedo averaged over a 1° × 1° domain is less than 1.5% (0.6%), 5.0% (4.1%), and 7.1% (11%) in order of increasing inhomogeneity, when albedos computed with cloud properties derived from viewing zenith angles between 0° and 60° are averaged and when the solar zenith angle is between 10° and 50°. When the solar zenith angle is 70°, the error increases to up to +24% (+37%) for all three scenes.
机译:检索云光学厚度的过程和有效半径从光芒来衡量卫星仪器模拟来确定检索属性和错误辐照度的计算。在0.64μm和3.7μm计算三云领域(层,层积云积云)所产生的大涡模拟模型。检索水平通量是被忽视的过程,domain-averaged中的错误检索到的光学厚度从最低点1%-32%(1%到-27%)和检索中的错误有效半径是0%到67%(0%到63%)太阳天顶角30°(50°)。光辉平均在1公里大小像素介绍了光学厚度,因为错误非线性关系的反映光辉和光学厚度。厚度和有效半径误差增加随着横向不均匀性。0.64μm反照率的计算独立柱近似检索使用属性从最低点(斜)看太阳天顶角50°,错误是什么? 0.3%到14%(?与真正的辐射传输计算云的属性。虽然光辉被迫在一个角度同意,因为云与平面平行单值的光学厚度和有效的半径不能始终与光辉角分布。检索云属性导致了反照率的错误。属性来自最低点和斜视图平均,反照率误差部分吗取消。μm(3.7μm)反照率平均在1°×1°域小于1.5%(0.6%),5.0%(4.1%),和7.1%(11%)的不均匀性增加,当地表反射率与云计算特性从观看天顶角度0°和60°之间平均当太阳天顶角10°至50°。是70°,错误增加+ 24% (+ 37%)为所有三个场景。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号