...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Implementation of cloud retrievals for TES atmospheric retrievals: 2. Characterization of cloud top pressure and effective optical depth retrievals
【24h】

Implementation of cloud retrievals for TES atmospheric retrievals: 2. Characterization of cloud top pressure and effective optical depth retrievals

机译:实现云检索的测试工程师大气的检索:2。云顶压力和有效的光学深度检索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We characterize and validate the cloud products from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) by comparing TES estimates of effective cloud optical depth and cloud top height to those from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (on EOS) (MODIS), the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), and to simulated data. TES measures in the infrared spectral region (650–2260 cm?1), where clouds have a ubiquitous impact on measured radiances and therefore on trace gas profile retrievals. The radiance contribution of clouds is parameterized in TES retrievals in terms of a set of frequency-dependent nonscattering effective optical depths and a cloud height. This unique approach jointly retrieves cloud parameters with surface temperature, emissivity, atmospheric temperature, and trace gases such as ozone from TES spectral radiances. We calculate the relationship between the true optical depth and the TES effective optical depth for a range of single-scatter albedo and phase functions to show how this varies with cloud type. We estimate the errors on retrieved cloud parameters using a simulated data set covering a wide range of cloud cases. For simulations with no noise on the radiances, cloud height errors are less than 30 hPa, and effective optical depth follows expected behavior for input optical depths of less than 3. When random noise is included on the radiances, and atmospheric variables are included in the retrieval, cloud height errors are approximately 200 hPa, and the estimated effective optical depth has sensitivity between optical depths of 0.3 and 10. The estimated errors from simulation are consistent with differences between TES and cloud top heights and optical depth from MODIS and AIRS.
机译:我们描述和验证云产品从对流层发射光谱仪(te)通过比较测试工程师的估计有效的云从光学深度和云顶高度中分辨率成像光谱仪(EOS) (MODIS),大气红外测深仪(播出),和模拟数据。措施在红外光谱区(650 - 2260 cm ? 1),云无处不在对美,因此在测量的影响示踪气体配置文件检索。云参数化在te的贡献检索一组频率相关nonscattering有效光学深度和云的高度。方法联合检索云参数表面温度、发射率、大气温度和臭氧等微量气体te光谱光芒。真正的光学深度和之间的关系TES有效的光学深度范围single-scatter反照率和相位函数来显示如何随云类型。错误使用检索云参数模拟数据集涵盖了广泛的云用例。光芒,云高错误都不到30岁hPa,和有效的光学深度遵循预期行为输入光学深度小于3。包括随机噪声时的光芒,和大气变量中检索,云高大约有错误200 hPa,估计有效的光深度光学深度之间的敏感性0.3和10。te和符合区别吗云顶高度和从MODIS光学深度和播出。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号