...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Estimate of the impact of absorbing aerosol over cloud on the MODIS retrievals of cloud optical thickness and effective radius using two independent retrievals of liquid water path
【24h】

Estimate of the impact of absorbing aerosol over cloud on the MODIS retrievals of cloud optical thickness and effective radius using two independent retrievals of liquid water path

机译:估计气溶胶吸收的影响云的MODIS云光学的检索使用两个厚度和有效半径独立检索液态水的路径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two independent satellite retrievals of cloud liquid water path (LWP) from the NASA Aqua satellite are used to diagnose the impact of absorbing biomass burning aerosol overlaying boundary-layer marine water clouds on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) retrievals of cloud optical thickness (τ) and cloud droplet effective radius (r e). In the MODIS retrieval over oceans, cloud reflectance in the 0.86-μm and 2.13-μm bands is used to simultaneously retrieve τ and r e. A low bias in the MODIS τ retrieval may result from reductions in the 0.86-μm reflectance, which is only very weakly absorbed by clouds, owing to absorption by aerosols in cases where biomass burning aerosols occur above water clouds. MODIS LWP, derived from the product of the retrieved τ and r e, is compared with LWP ocean retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E), determined from cloud microwave emission that is transparent to aerosols. For the coastal Atlantic southern African region investigated in this study, a systematic difference between AMSR-E and MODIS LWP retrievals is found for stratocumulus clouds over three biomass burning months in 2005 and 2006 that is consistent with above-cloud absorbing aerosols. Biomass burning aerosol is detected using the ultraviolet aerosol index from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the Aura satellite. The LWP difference (AMSR-E minus MODIS) increases both with increasing τ and increasing OMI aerosol index. During the biomass burning season the mean LWP difference is 14 g m?2, which is within the 15–20 g m?2 range of estimated uncertainties in instantaneous LWP retrievals. For samples with only low amounts of overlaying smoke (OMI AI ≤ 1) the difference is 9.4, suggesting that the impact of smoke aerosols on the mean MODIS LWP is 5.6 g m?2. Only for scenes with OMI aerosol index greater than 2 does the average LWP difference and the estimated bias in MODIS cloud optical thickness attributable to the impact of overlaying biomass burning aerosol exceed the instantaneous uncertainty in the retrievals.
机译:两个独立的卫星检索云液态水路径从NASA的Aqua (LWP)卫星是用于诊断的影响吸收生物质燃烧气溶胶覆盖边界层云的海洋水中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)(τ)和检索的云光学厚度云滴有效半径(r e)的MODIS检索在海洋,云反射0.86 - 2.13μm -μm乐队用于同时检索τ和r e。较低的偏见MODISτ检索可能会减少在0.86μm反射,只是非常弱被云层吸收,由于吸收了气溶胶在这种情况下,生物质燃烧气溶胶发生在水面上云。检索的产品τ和r e相比之下,LWP海洋的检索高级微波扫描Radiometer-EOS从云微波(amsr - e),确定透明气溶胶的排放。大西洋海岸南部非洲地区在这项研究中,研究系统amsr - e和MODIS LWP之间的区别检索发现,层积云在2005年和2006年生物质燃烧三个月这是符合云层的吸收气溶胶。使用的紫外线气溶胶指数臭氧监测仪)光环卫星。随着τ和MODIS)增加尾身茂气溶胶指数增加。燃烧的季节均值LWP区别是14 gm ?在瞬时LWP估计的不确定性检索。覆盖烟(OMI AI≤1)的区别9.4,说明烟雾气溶胶的影响意思是MODIS LWP 5.6 g m ? 2。场景OMI气溶胶指数大于2平均LWP差异和估计的偏差由于在MODIS云光学厚度覆盖生物质燃烧气溶胶的影响超过的瞬时不确定性检索。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号