...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart and vessels: An international journal >Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.
【24h】

Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.

机译:前瞻性随机研究的三的降压效果和耐受性降压药、洛沙坦氨氯地平,赖诺普利,在高血压病人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We prospectively evaluated the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three different antihypertensive agents, losartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker), amlodipine (calcium channel blocker), and lisinopril (angiotensin-coverting enzyme inhibitor), in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 2-week washout period, 121 patients were randomly allocated to three different groups for 12 weeks. Medications were titrated upward as necessary to achieve the goal office-recorded sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) (defined as SiDBP ==900 mmHg but with a >==10 mmHg drop from baseline). Efficacy and tolerability were assessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of therapy with each regimen. At 12 weeks, significant differences in SiDBP compared with data of baseline were noted in all three groups ( P << 0.001 in all comparisons). Similarly, significant differences in the sitting systolic blood pressure compared with baseline data were also seen for all three groups ( P << 0.001 in allcomparisons). The number of patients reaching goal SiDBP were comparable for the three groups: 25 patients (62.5%) in the losartan group, 27 patients (67.5%) in the amlodipine group, and 22 patients (59.5%) in the lisinopril group (not significant). Amlodipine produced a more pronounced reduction in SiDBP than the other two medications, although without statistical significance. Patients receiving lisinopril showed a high incidence of coughing (31.7%). Low leg edema was noted only in the amlodipine group (7.5%). Compared with the amlodipine and lisinopril groups, the losartan group seemed to have relatively fewer episodes (7.5%), and fewer patients (three cases) experienced adverse effects. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that losartan has the same antihypertensive effect, but has superior tolerability compared with the other two drugs. Coughing was a common side effect of lisinopril therapy in our population.
机译:我们前瞻性地评价抗高血压效果和三种不同的耐受性降压药,洛沙坦(血管紧张素ⅱ受体阻滞剂),氨氯地平(钙通道拦截器),赖诺普利(angiotensin-coverting酶抑制剂),患者轻度到中度高血压。冲刷时期,121名患者被随机分配给三个不同的组12周。药物被滴定向上为必要实现目标office-recorded坐着舒张压(SiDBP)(定义为SiDBP = = 900毫米汞柱,但> = = 10毫米汞柱从基线)。耐受性进行评估后4、8和12周与每个疗程的治疗。相比,SiDBP显著差异数据的基线被发现在所有三个组(在所有比较P < < 0.001)。坐在收缩压显著差异血压与基线数据也看到所有三组(P < < 0.001allcomparisons)。目标SiDBP可比的三组:洛沙坦组25例(62.5%),27岁氨氯地平组的患者(67.5%),22赖诺普利组的患者(59.5%)(不是重要的)。比其他两个SiDBP明显减少药物,虽然没有统计的意义。显示咳嗽的发生率高(31.7%)。腿部水肿指出只有在氨氯地平组(7.5%)。赖诺普利组,洛沙坦组似乎相对较少的集(7.5%),和更少的例(3例)经验丰富的不利效果。洛沙坦降压相同效果,但相比,耐受性好与其他两种药物。赖诺普利治疗的副作用人口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号