...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology. >No advantage of Abeta_42-lowering NSAIDs for prevention of Alzheimer dementia in six pooled cohort studies
【24h】

No advantage of Abeta_42-lowering NSAIDs for prevention of Alzheimer dementia in six pooled cohort studies

机译:没有利用Abeta_42-lowering非甾体抗炎药在六个联合预防老年痴呆队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Observational studies show reduced incidence of Alzheimer dementia (AD) in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). One hypothesis holds that the subset of NSAIDs known as selective Abeta_42-Iowering agents (SALAs) is responsible for this apparent reduction in AD risk.Methods: We pooled individual-level data from six prospective studies to obtain a sufficient sample to examine AD risk in users of SALA vs non-SALA NSAIDs.Results: Of 13,499 initially dementia-free participants (70,863 person-years), 820 developed incident AD. Users of NSAIDs (29.6%) showed reduced risk of AD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77, 95% Cl 0.65-0.91). The point estimates were similar for SALAs (aHR 0.87, Cl 0.72-1.04) and non-SALAs (aHR 0.75, Cl 0.56-1.01). Because 573 NSAID users (14.5%) reported taking both a SALA and non-SALA, we examined their use alone and in combination. Resulting aHRs were 0.82 (Cl 0.67-0.99) for SALA only, 0.60 (Cl 0.40-0.90) for non-SALA only, and 0.87 (Cl 0.57-1.33) for both NSAIDs (Wald test for differences, p = 0.32). The 40.7% of participants who used aspirin also showed reduced risk of AD, even when they used no other NSAIDs (aHR 0.78, Cl 0.66-0.92). By contrast, there was no association with use of acetaminophen (aHR 0.93, Cl 0.76-1.13).Conclusions: In this pooled dataset, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use reduced the risk of Alzheimer dementia (AD). However, there was no apparent advantage in AD risk reduction for the subset of NSAIDs shown to selectively lower Abeta_42, suggesting that all conventional NSAIDs including aspirin have a similar protective effect in humans.
机译:简介:观察研究显示减少老年痴呆的发病率(广告)的用户非甾体类抗炎药(非甾体抗炎药)。一种假说认为,非甾体抗炎药的子集被称为选择性Abeta_42-Iowering代理(萨拉斯)负责这个明显减少广告的风险。从六个潜在个体层面的数据研究,以获得足够的抽样检查在萨拉的用户vs non-SALA广告风险非甾体抗炎药。参与者(70863组),820年事件的广告。减少广告的风险(风险比(aHR)调整0.77, 95%氯0.65 - -0.91)。萨拉斯相似(aHR 0.87, Cl 0.72 - -1.04)non-SALAs (aHR 0.75, Cl 0.56 - -1.01)。服用非甾体消炎药(14.5%)报告把萨拉non-SALA,我们检查了他们的孤独和使用组合。为萨拉0.67 - -0.99),0.60 (Cl 0.40 - -0.90)non-SALA, 0.87 (Cl 0.57 - -1.33)非甾体抗炎药(瓦尔德测试差异,p = 0.32)。40.7%的参与者使用阿司匹林显示降低广告的风险,即使他们没有使用0.78其他非甾体抗炎药(aHR, Cl 0.66 - -0.92)。相反,没有与使用对乙酰氨基酚(aHR 0.93, Cl0.76 - -1.13)。非甾体类抗炎药(非甾体抗炎药)使用减少老年痴呆(AD)的风险。然而,在广告没有明显优势非甾体抗炎药证明的风险减少的子集Abeta_42选择性低,表明所有传统的非甾体抗炎药包括阿斯匹林有一个类似的保护作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号