首页> 外文期刊>Heart and vessels: An international journal >Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study

机译:比较低剂量呋喃苯胺酸和盐carperitide治疗急性失代偿性的心力衰竭:单中心回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hypertonic saline with furosemide has been proposed for a long time as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We previously reported the efficacy of continuous infusion of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide in treatment for ADHF. Although this therapeutic strategy can be a useful option for effective decongestion in treatment for ADHF, there is no study that assesses the effect and safety of saline supplementation compared with standard therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion compared with carperitide. We compared clinical outcomes, adverse events, and cost for patients receiving carperitide (carperitide group) with those for patients receiving 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide (salt group) during the initial hospitalization for ADHF. The cost analysis was performed on the basis of the previous report about cost-effectiveness of acute heart failure. A total of 175 ADHF patients received either carperitide (n = 111) or 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion (n = 64) as initial treatment. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (27 +/- 19 vs. 25 +/- 16 day, p = 0.170) and infusion period (7.2 +/- 6.1 vs. 8.4 +/- 7.5 day, p = 0.474) between the two groups. The incidence of rehospitalization did not differ at 1 month (7.6 vs. 6.6 %, p = 1.000) and 1 year (36.8 vs. 37.7 %, p = 0.907) between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference for 1 year all-cause mortality between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.724). The single hospitalization cost was 95,314 yen lower and the yearly hospitalization cost 125,628 yen lower in the salt group compared with the carperitide group. Thus, intravenous 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion is as effective as carperitide in terms of clinical outcome and is a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ADHF.
机译:高渗盐水与呋喃苯胺酸作为一个有效的提议很长一段时间治疗急性治疗选择失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)。连续输注的疗效1.7%高渗盐水+低剂量呋喃苯胺酸在治疗ADHF。有效的策略可以是一个有用的选择在治疗ADHF拥挤的消除,没有研究,评估的效果和安全盐水补充与标准治疗在日本。调查的有效性、安全性和成本效益的1.7%高渗盐水+低剂量呋喃苯胺酸灌注相比carperitide。不良事件,并为病人接受成本与那些carperitide (carperitide组)病人接受1.7%高渗盐水+低剂量呋喃苯胺酸(盐组)初始ADHF住院治疗。分析的基础上进行以前的报告严重的成本效益心力衰竭。收到carperitide (n = 111)或1.7%高渗盐水+低剂量呋喃苯胺酸输液(n = 64)作为初始治疗。没有住院时间差异(27 + / - 19比25 + / - 16天,p = 0.170)灌注时间(7.2 + / - 6.1和8.4 + / - 7.5天,两组之间的p = 0.474)。再入院治疗的1个月没有差别(7.6和6.6%,p = 1.000), 1年(36.8 vs。37.7%,两组之间的p = 0.907)。kaplan meier曲线显示无显著区别1年之间的全因死亡率两组(log-rank, p = 0.724)。住院费用和低95314日元每年住院治疗花费125628日圆低盐组与carperitide相比组。+低剂量呋喃苯胺酸灌注是有效的临床结果和carperitide是一个具有成本效益的治疗策略ADHF治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号