首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Effects of different geomagnetic storm drivers on the ring current: CRCM results
【24h】

Effects of different geomagnetic storm drivers on the ring current: CRCM results

机译:不同的磁暴司机的影响环电流:CRCM结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The storm-time magnetic disturbance at the Earth's equator, as commonly measured by the Dst index, is induced by currents in the near-Earth magnetosphere. The ring current is generally considered the most important contributor, but other magnetospheric currents have also been found to have significant effects. Of the two main types of solar geomagnetic storm drivers, Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) tend to have a much greater impact on Dst than Corotating Interaction Regions (CIRs). Ring current models have been found to underestimate Dst, particularly during storms driven by CIRs. One possible explanation is that the models neglect to handle some aspect of ring current physics that is particularly important for CIRs. This study uses the Comprehensive Ring Current Model (CRCM) to estimate the ring current contribution to Dst for a selection of storms of various strengths and different drivers (CMEs and CIRs) that have solar wind parameters that fit a typical profile. The model boundary is set to 10 R_E at the equator, encompassing the entire ring current region. The magnetic field is held fixed, based on average storm parameters, which limits our model results to the effects of convection and plasma sheet density at the model boundary. Our model results generally show good agreement with the size and timing of fluctuations in Dst, which indicates that convection and boundary conditions play an important role in shaping Dst. We also find excellent agreement with the magnitude of Dst for CME-driven storms. For CIR-driven storms, however, the magnitude at the peak of the storm frequently deviates from actual Dst. In general, we agree with the results of previous research that CIR-driven storms are more underpredicted. However, this study includes some weaker CIR-driven storms for which Dst is actually overpredicted. Overall, when examining the dependence of modeled Dst* on actual Dst* at storm peak, we find that there is a statistically significant difference between CME- and CIR-driven storms. We also find that approximately half of the total ring current energy lies beyond an L-value of 6.6. However, this figure could be overestimated due to the use of a static magnetic field, which limits radial transport. Key Points Modeled vs actual Dst at storm peak is significantly different for CMEs and CIRs Convection and plasma sheet density are important for ring current energization Model shows half of total ring current energy lies beyond an L-value of 6.6
机译:在地球的storm-time磁干扰赤道,通常由Dst指数衡量,感应电流的近地吗磁气圈。被认为是最重要的因素,但是也被其他磁性层的电流发现有显著的影响。主要类型的太阳磁暴司机,日冕物质抛射(cme)容易得多对Dst的影响大于共转交互地区(cir)。发现低估Dst,特别是在风暴由贵会。是模型处理某些方面忽视吗尤其是环电流的物理重要的新闻。综合环电流模型(CRCM)估计Dst的环电流的贡献的各种优势和风暴不同的驱动程序(cme和新闻),太阳能风参数符合典型的形象。模型边界设置为10 R_E赤道,包括整个环电流区。磁场保持固定,根据平均水平风暴参数,这限制了我们的模型结果对流的影响和等离子表在模型边界密度。通常与大小和显示良好的协议这表明,时机Dst的波动对流边界条件发挥重要的作用在塑造Dst。优秀的协议和Dst的大小CME-driven风暴。然而,大小在暴风雨的高峰期经常偏离实际的Dst。我们同意先前的研究的结果CIR-driven风暴更低估了。然而,这项研究包括一些实力较弱的Dst是CIR-driven风暴overpredicted。的依赖关系建模Dst在实际Dst * *风暴的高峰期,我们发现有一个统计CME和显著的区别CIR-driven风暴。大约一半的总电流环能源之外的l值6.6。这个数字可能高估了由于使用的静态磁场径向的限制交通工具。我们对于太阳风暴风暴峰值显著不同圆形的对流和等离子体密度板重要的环电流激发模型显示一半的总环电流能量所在超出一个l值为6.6

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号