...
首页> 外文期刊>Vox Sanguinis: International Journal of Blood Transfusion and Immunohaematology >Comparison of flow cytometry vs. a haematology cell analyser-based method to guide the optimal time-point for peripheral blood stem cell apheresis.
【24h】

Comparison of flow cytometry vs. a haematology cell analyser-based method to guide the optimal time-point for peripheral blood stem cell apheresis.

机译:流式细胞术的比较与血液学细胞analyser-based指导最优方法周围血干细胞的时间点apheresis。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For timing the onset of apheresis, parameters obtained by flow cytometry and by a haematological cell analyser were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Haematopoietic cell counts (n = 159) were performed by two different methods; CD34 analyses by flow cytometry, immature myeloid information (IMI) and human progenitor cell counts (HPC) by a haematological cell analyser. RESULTS: Comparing the IMI total results with CD34+ analyses (n = 159) revealed a correlation of r = 0.46 (P < 0.05). Similar results were obtained for HPC (r = 0.44; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The haematology analyser-based method does not allow the precise determination of absolute haematopoietic stem cell numbers and is thus not able to replace flow cytometry for the monitoring of peripheral blood stem cell counts.
机译:背景和目的:时间的发生通过流式细胞术apheresis,参数和血液学的细胞分析仪比较。细胞计数(n = 159)是由两个不同的方法;血细胞计数,不成熟的骨髓(IMI)和信息人类的祖细胞计数(HPC)的血液学的细胞分析仪。IMI总结果与CD34 +分析(n =159)显示相关系数r = 0.46 (P <0.05)。0.44;analyser-based不允许精确的方法测定绝对造血的茎细胞数量,因此无法取代流监测外周血血细胞计数干细胞数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号