...
首页> 外文期刊>Vox Sanguinis: International Journal of Blood Transfusion and Immunohaematology >Effect of Haemostatic Control Resuscitation on mortality in massively bleeding patients: a before and after study.
【24h】

Effect of Haemostatic Control Resuscitation on mortality in massively bleeding patients: a before and after study.

机译:止血剂控制复苏的效果大量出血患者死亡率:一个之前和之后的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence supporting the use of platelets and plasma in resuscitation of massive bleedings is questionable. Current consensus guidelines recommend restrictive use. Our aim was to determine the effect of changing the transfusion practice on 30-day survival in massively bleeding patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive adult patients receiving more than 10 units of red blood cells (RBC) within 24 h 2 years prior to (2002-2003) and 2 years after (2005-2006) a change in transfusion practice were included. In 2004, we implemented Haemostatic Control Resuscitation (HCR) with preemptive use of platelets and plasma, administered in transfusion packages, comprising 5 units of RBCs, 5 units of fresh-frozen plasma and 2 units of platelet concentrates (PC), when massive bleeding occurred or upon arrival at the emergency room and thereafter directed by thrombelastography throughout the peri- and postoperative period. RESULTS: In 2005-2006, the 442 patients received more PCs within 24 hfrom admission [mean 5.0 (SD 4.2) vs. 1.7 (2.0); P < 0.0001] and had a smaller decrease in platelet count during the bleeding episode [91.5 (81.2) vs. 119.7 (100.8) x 10(9)/l; P = 0.0025] than the 390 patients treated in 2002-2003. Thirty-day mortality was reduced in 2005-2006 (20.4% vs. 31.5%; P = 0.0002) and at 90-day (22.4% vs. 34.6%; P < 0.0001) as compared to 2002-2003. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who experience massive bleeding, HCR with platelets and plasma, as guided by thrombelastography, is associated with improved survival. While confirmation from a randomized controlled trial is urgently needed, HCR may be considered in these patients.
机译:背景和目的:支持证据使用血小板和血浆的复苏大规模的流血是有问题的。共识指南建议限制使用。我们的目标是确定变化的影响输血实践在30天的生存大量出血的病人。方法:连续的成年患者10多个单位的红细胞(RBC)之前在24 h 2年(2002 - 2003)和2年之后(2005 - 2006)输血的变化实践是包括在内。止血剂控制复苏(HCR)先发制人的血小板和血浆的使用,在输血包管理,包括5单位的红细胞表面,5单位用来进行等离子体和2单位血小板浓缩液(PC),当大量出血发生或到达急诊室和此后执导整个邻近和thrombelastography术后时期。442名患者在24 hfrom收到了更多的电脑承认(平均5.0(标准差4.2)和1.7 (2.0);0.0001)和血小板减少较小数在流血事件[91.5 (81.2)与119.7 x 10 (9) / l (100.8);2002 - 2003年390例患者治疗。死亡率降低了2005 - 2006年(20.4% vs。31.5%;34.6%;结论:在病人大量经验出血,HCR血小板和血浆,thrombelastography的指导下,与相关联改善生存。随机对照试验是急需的,HCR可能被认为是在这些患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号