...
首页> 外文期刊>Vox Sanguinis: International Journal of Blood Transfusion and Immunohaematology >Evaluation of two chlorhexidine - alcohol-based skin disinfectants in blood donation setting
【24h】

Evaluation of two chlorhexidine - alcohol-based skin disinfectants in blood donation setting

机译:评估两个洗必泰——酒精皮肤消毒剂献血设置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Source reduction is important in minimizing bacterial-contaminated risk of blood products, but previous evaluation of chlorhexidine (CHX) was confounded by inability of Tween and lecithin to neutralize CHX. The study aims to address this limitation and also evaluates the effectiveness of two CHX-alcohol-based skin disinfectants in blood donation setting. Methods: A two-stage observational study was conducted. A single step 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol brush (CHX/IPA-1) was first compared with current skin disinfection procedure consisting of sequential application of 10% povidone-iodine and 70% isopropyl alcohol (PI/IPA). Standard plates with conventional neutralizers (0·3% Tween-80, 0·1% lecithin) were used to enumerate residual bacterial counts. Then, CHX/IPA-1 was compared with another applicator CHX/IPA-2 with identical disinfectant contents using in-house plates with neutralizers (3% Tween-80, 0·3% lecithin, 0·1% histidine, 0·5% sodium thiosulphate, 3% saponin, 1% ether sulphate) having enhanced ability to neutralize CHX. Results: All three products were found to reduce plate counts by 2 log10 after disinfection. The CHX/IPA-1 group gave fewer residual bacterial growth on standard plates than PI/IPA group (5·9% vs. 61·7%, P 0·001). With the use of in-house plates, residual bacterial growth was of no difference in both CHX/IPA-1 and CHX/IPA-2 groups (42·5% vs. 49·4%, P = 0·26). Conclusion: Good efficacy was observed with one-stage application of CHX/IPA in predonation skin disinfection and it could replace PI/IPA. However, the efficacy of CHX/IPA could be grossly overestimated in testing with standard plates because of insufficient neutralization.
机译:背景:源减少是很重要的bacterial-contaminated血的风险最小化产品,但之前的评价洗必泰(CHX)被不抱愧蒙羞渐变和卵磷脂中和CHX。研究旨在解决这个限制也评估的有效性两个CHX-alcohol-based皮肤消毒剂的血液捐款设置。进行了观察研究。异丙醇2%洗必泰葡萄糖酸/ 70%刷(CHX / IPA-1)首次与电流皮肤消毒过程组成的聚乙烯吡咯酮碘和序贯应用10%70%异丙醇(π/异丙醇)。与传统的中和剂(0·3%渐变- 80,0·1%卵磷脂)被用来列举残留细菌计数。与另一个涂布CHX / IPA-2相同消毒剂使用内部板块和内容中和剂(3%渐变- 80、0·3%卵磷脂、0·1%组氨酸、0·5%硫代硫酸钠3%皂苷,1%醚硫酸盐)增强的能力中和CHX。发现板计数减少比;后消毒。少残留细菌生长标准板比π/异丙醇组(5·9%和61·7%,P & 0·001)。细菌生长是没有区别的CHX / IPA-1, and CHX / IPA-2 groups(42颗49 5% vs。4%,奥P = 0·26)。单程CHX /异丙醇的应用predonation皮肤消毒和可能取代π/异丙醇。可以在测试严重高估了因为不够标准板中和。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号