...
首页> 外文期刊>Vox Sanguinis: International Journal of Blood Transfusion and Immunohaematology >Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost‐benefit analysis based on a meta‐analysis
【24h】

Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost‐benefit analysis based on a meta‐analysis

机译:卫生经济学的病人血液管理:a成本效益分析是基于一个meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Objectives Patient Blood Management (PBM) is the timely application of evidence‐based medical and surgical concepts designed to improve haemoglobin concentration, optimize haemostasis and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The focus of this cost‐benefit analysis is to analyse the economic benefit of widespread implementation of a multimodal PBM programme. Materials and Methods Based on a recent meta‐analysis including 17 studies (235?000 patients) comparing PBM with control care and data from the University Hospital Frankfurt, a cost‐benefit analysis was performed. Outcome data were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, number of transfused RBC units, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Costs were considered for the following three PBM interventions as examples: anaemia management including therapy of iron deficiency, use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid. For sensitivity analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed. Results Iron supplementation was applied in 3·1%, cell salvage in 65% and tranexamic acid in 89% of the PBM patients. In total, applying these three PBM interventions costs €129·04 per patient. However, PBM was associated with a reduction in transfusion rate, transfused RBC units per patient, and LOS which yielded to mean savings of €150·64 per patient. Thus, the overall benefit of PBM implementation was €21·60 per patient. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the cost savings on the outcome side exceeded the PBM costs in approximately 2/3 of all repetitions and the total benefit was €1?878?000 in 100·000 simulated patients. Conclusion Resources to implement a multimodal PBM concept optimizing patient care and safety can be cost‐effectively.
机译:背景和目标病人血液管理(PBM)的及时应用证据基础旨在提高医疗和外科概念血红蛋白浓度,优化止血法,减少失血,以改善病人的结果。分析的经济效益分析广泛实现的多通道PBM计划。最近的meta分析包括17个研究(在235年?保健和大学医院的数据法兰克福,一个成本效益分析。结果数据红细胞(RBC)红细胞输血,输血的数量单位,和住院时间(洛杉矶)。考虑以下三个PBM干预措施为例:贫血管理包括治疗缺铁,电池的使用救助和氨甲环酸。分析,进行蒙特卡罗模拟。结果补铁是应用于3·1%,细胞打捞在65%和89%的氨甲环酸PBM病人。每个病人PBM干预成本€129·04。然而,PBM和减少有关红细胞输血,输血每单位耐心,洛杉矶的产生意味着储蓄€150·64每个病人。每个病人PBM实现€21·60。蒙特卡罗模拟,节省成本结果超过了PBM成本大约2/3的重复和878年总收益是€1 ? ?病人。多通道PBM概念优化病人护理可以成本和安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号