...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Heart failure >Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of cardiac events in patients with diabetes enrolled in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT).
【24h】

Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of cardiac events in patients with diabetes enrolled in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT).

机译:心脏再同步化治疗降低了风险在糖尿病患者的心脏事件多通道自动注册与心脏除颤器植入试验resynchronization疗法(MADIT-CRT)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding whether the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) influences the benefit of cardiac resynchronization with defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) in heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effect of CRT-D was evaluated in 1817 patients who were enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Patients were minimally symptomatic (New York Heart Association class I or II), with ejection fraction /=130 ms. We used Cox regression to determine hazard ratio (HR) of CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the risk of HF event or death, whichever came first (MADIT-CRT primary end point), in DM (n=552) and non-DM (n=1265) patients. Compared with the non-DM patients, those with DM had more coronary risk factors. During an average follow-up of 2.4 years, DM patients had significantly more primary end point events than non-DM patients (26.6% versus 18%, P<0.001). CRT-D was associated with a significant reduction in risk of primary end point in both DM (HR=0.56, P<0.001) and non-DM patients (HR=0.67, P=0.003). Compared with non-DM patients, CRT-D:ICD HRs in DM patients were lower in the total population, and in subgroups with ischemic cardiomyopathy (0.63 versus 0.64), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (0.39 versus 0.73), and left bundle-branch block (0.36 versus 0.50). There were no significant differences in ventricular remodeling, arrhythmia events, or device-related complications between DM and non-DM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, mildly symptomatic HF, and wide QRS complex derive similar benefit from CRT-D compared with patients without diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.
机译:背景:关于是否数据是有限的糖尿病(DM)的影响心脏再同步的好处除颤器治疗(CRT-D)心力衰竭(高频)的病人。CRT-D 1817年评估病人多通道自动注册与心脏除颤器植入试验再同步化治疗(MADIT-CRT)。最低限度症状(纽约的心关联类I或II),喷发分数 / = 130毫秒。回归确定风险比(人力资源)CRT-D与植入心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗心力衰竭的风险事件或死亡,哪个是第一位的(MADIT-CRT主要终点),在DM (n = 552)non-DM (n = 1265)的病人。non-DM病人,DM患者有更多的冠状动脉风险因素。年,DM患者更主要终点事件比non-DM(26.6%的病人和18%,P < 0.001)。显著减少风险基本结束点在DM (HR = 0.56, P < 0.001)和non-DM病人(HR = 0.67, P = 0.003)。病人,CRT-D: ICD小时在DM患者低总人口中,子组缺血性心肌病(0.63和0.64),非缺血型心肌病(0.39和0.73),和左束支阻滞(0.36和0.50)。没有显著差异心室重构、心律失常事件或device-related DM和并发症non-DM病人。糖尿病、左心室功能障碍、温和有症状的心力衰竭和宽QRS波群推导类似的患者相比,受益于CRT-D没有糖尿病。URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。identifier: NCT00180271。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号