首页> 外文期刊>Injury prevention: journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention >Analysis of paediatric drowning deaths in Washington State using the child death review (CDR) for surveillance: what CDR does and does not tell us about lethal drowning injury.
【24h】

Analysis of paediatric drowning deaths in Washington State using the child death review (CDR) for surveillance: what CDR does and does not tell us about lethal drowning injury.

机译:分析儿科溺水死亡华盛顿州使用儿童死亡评审(CDR)用于监测:什么CDR和没有告诉我们关于致命溺水伤害。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Drowning is second cause of paediatric injury death in Washington State. Child death review (CDR) data provide the unique opportunity to identify regional risk factors and opportunities for drowning prevention. METHODS: CDR teams' data for drowning deaths of children <18 years between 1999 and 2003 were analysed for victim and event characteristics, and existing prevention/protective factors. A working group made data driven recommendations. Subsequent interventions were noted. RESULTS: Drowning death rates were significantly higher among Asian Pacific Islander children (3.3 per 100,000). Disproportionately, 32% of deaths involved families with prior child protective services (CPS) referrals. Most deaths (73%) occurred in open water; the proportion in open water increased from 42% of <5-year-olds, 83% of 5-9-year-olds, to 90% of 10-17-year-olds. Thirty per cent drowned at parks; 29% drowned in residential settings. Pre-drowning activity for 42% was swimming or playing in the water. Alcohol and drug use were low. Neglect/poor supervision was considered a factor in 68% (21/31) of the deaths of children <5 years of age. State CDR recommendations led to the development of a drowning prevention campaign targeted to an Asian American community, intra-agency changes resulting in reinstatement of lifeguard staffing and addition of lifejacket loaner programmes, collaboration with state commissions to enforce a state pool fencing ordinance, and model legislation prohibiting swimming in dangerous waterways. CONCLUSION: CDR data collection and review process was an effective surveillance tool. It identified specific regional high risk groups and sites for drowning prevention and led to recommendations and implementation of effective local and state injury prevention interventions.
机译:背景:溺水是儿科的第二个原因伤害死亡在华盛顿州。评论(CDR)数据提供了独特的机会确定区域因素和风险预防溺水的机会。CDR团队的溺水死亡的儿童的数据< 18年1999年和2003年之间进行了分析受害者和事件的特点和现有的预防/保护性因素。由数据驱动的建议。干预是指出。率要显著高于亚洲人太平洋岛民儿童(3.3 100000)。不成比例,32%的死亡家庭在儿童保护服务(CPS)推荐。打开水;从42%上升的< 5岁,83%的5-9-year-olds, 10-17-year-olds的90%。每分钱淹死在公园;住宅设置。42%是游泳或打在水里。和药物使用较低。被认为是一个因素在68%(21/31)的吗5岁以下儿童死亡。导致的发展建议预防溺水针对亚洲运动美国社区,机构内部的变化导致救生员员工复职和救生衣的代替品项目,与国家合作委员会实施状态池击剑条例和模型立法禁止游泳危险水道。审查过程是一个有效的监测工具。组织和网站预防溺水和领导建议和实施有效的地方和国家伤害预防干预措施。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号