...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources Compliance Library >Infringement ?nding, injunction affirmed in dispute over generic drug for treating schizophrenia
【24h】

Infringement ?nding, injunction affirmed in dispute over generic drug for treating schizophrenia

机译:侵权?扩散连接,命令确认纠纷一般药物治疗精神分裂症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a split decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the District of Delaware holding, after a bench trial, that West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Ltd. and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. subsidiary (now known as Hikma Pharmaceuticals International Ltd. and Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.) (collectively, “West-Ward” or “Hikma”) induced infringement of asserted claims of a patent for methods of treating schizophrenia. The appeals court also affirmed the district court’s determination that the patent-in-suit was not invalid, and its grant of injunctive relief to the patent’s owner, Aventisub LLC, and its exclusive licensee, Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Vanda”). Chief Judge Sharon Prost wrote in dissent, opining that the patentin- suit was directed to an ineligible law of nature (Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Ltd., April 13, 2018, Sleet, G.).
机译:在一个分裂的决定,美国上诉法院联邦巡回上诉法院肯定的决定特拉华州控股,在板凳上审判,West-Ward药品国际有限公司和West-Ward制药集团子公司(现在称为Hikma国际有限公司和Hikma药品美国制药公司)(总的来说,“West-Ward”或“Hikma”)诱导侵犯断言方法的专利治疗精神分裂症。肯定了地方法院的决心patent-in-suit并非无效,其资助禁令救济的专利所有者,Aventisub有限责任公司,其独家许可,万带兰制药公司(总的来说,“中联”)。首席法官Sharon普罗斯特在异议中写道,认为patentin——套装是指向一个资格的自然法则(万带兰制药公司诉West-Ward医药国际有限公司,4月13日2018年,雨夹雪,g)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号