【24h】

Prognosis of critical limb ischemia: Major vs. minor amputation comparison

机译:危重肢体缺血预后:主要vs。小截肢的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Healthcare providers treating wounds have difficulties assessing the prognosis of patients with critical limb ischemia who had been discharged after complete healing of major amputation wounds. The word major in major amputation gives the impression of being more severe than minor amputation. Therefore, even if wounds are healed after major amputation, they imagine that prognosis after major amputation would be poorer than that after minor amputation. We investigated the prognosis of diabetic nephropathy patients 2 years after amputations. Those patients underwent dialysis as well as amputation following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for their foot wounds. They were ambulatory prior to these surgeries. Among 56 cases of minor amputation, 45 were males and 11 were females, and mortality was 41.1%. The mortality of cases with and without a coronary intervention history was 53.1% and 25.0%, respectively (p=0.034). Among 10 cases of major amputation, 9 were males and 1 was female, and mortality was 60%. The mortality of cases with and without a coronary intervention history was 75.0% and 0%, respectively. Although we predicted poor prognosis in cases with major amputation, there was no significant difference in mortality 2 years after amputations (p=0.267). Thus far poor prognosis has been reported for major amputation. It might be due to inclusion of the following patients: patients with wounds proximal to ankle joints, patients with extensive gangrene spreading to the lower legs, patients with septicemia from wound infection and who died around the time of operation, and patients with malnutrition. The results of our present study showed that the outcomes at 2 years postoperatively were similar between patients with major amputations and those with minor amputations, if surgical wounds were able to heal. We should not estimate the prognosis by the level of amputation, rather we should consider the effect of coronary intervention history on prognosis.
机译:卫生保健提供者治疗伤口困难评估患者的预后与严重肢体缺血症出院后主要完全痊愈截肢伤口。截肢给人的印象是更多严重的比小截肢。伤口愈合后主要截肢,他们想象大截肢后预后比小截肢后将会变得更穷。我们调查了糖尿病患者的预后肾病患者截肢后2年。接受透析的患者以及截肢后经皮穿为他们的脚伤口血管成形术。这些手术前走动的。轻微病例截肢,45岁男性和11所示是雌性,死亡率为41.1%。病例死亡率和冠状动脉干预历史是53.1%和25.0%,分别(p = 0.034)。截肢,9是男性和女性1,死亡率是60%。和冠状动脉介入历史分别为75.0%和0%。预后不良的情况下与主要截肢,死亡率没有显著差异2年前截肢(p = 0.267)。预后不良为主要报道截肢。病人:患者伤口近端患者踝关节,广泛的坏疽蔓延到小腿,患者从伤口感染败血症和死亡操作前后,患者营养不良。显示结果在2年术后患者之间是相似的与主要截肢和那些小截肢,如果手术伤口就可以愈合。水平截肢,而我们应该考虑冠状动脉介入历史的影响预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号