首页> 外文期刊>Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management >Assessing forage bermudagrass cultivar tolerance to glyphosate application
【24h】

Assessing forage bermudagrass cultivar tolerance to glyphosate application

机译:评估饲料bermudagrass品种宽容草甘膦应用程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract In‐season weed control with glyphosate could be a feasible option if bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] tolerance to glyphosate was better understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of bermudagrass cultivars ‘Goodwell’ and ‘Greenfield’ to varying glyphosate rates under controlled environment. The experimental design was a factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design (CRD) with the two forage bermudagrass cultivars and the five glyphosate application rates (0.35, 0.47, 0.95, 1.37, and 2.75 lb a.i. ac−1) plus the nontreated control. Visual injury (VI) was collected at 8, 16, and 24 days after glyphosate application (DAG), and dry matter regrowth relative to nontreated control (%DMRrel) was measured at 56 DAG. Results indicated that VI developed faster in Goodwell until 8 DAG, but both cultivars had similar glyphosate VI at its peak (16 DAG). Although glyphosate VI was similar in both cultivars at 16 and 24 DAG, Goodwell showed greater %DMRrel at glyphosate rates ≥0.95 lb a.i. ac−1 than Greenfield at 56 DAG. Moreover, the prediction of %DMRrel from previous canopy VI followed distinct negative exponential relationships for each cultivar‐DAG combination. The Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) numerical differences were negligible when comparing relationships at different DAGs for a specific cultivar. Practically, VI readings taken at any evaluated DAGs were considered appropriate for estimating %DMRrel. Results suggested that bermudagrass glyphosate tolerance is cultivar‐dependent, where Goodwell showed improved tolerance allowing in‐season glyphosate application to control weeds at higher rates than Greenfield. Studies at field conditions must be performed to validate our findings.
机译:摘要季节除草与草甘膦可能是一个可行的选项如果bermudagrass[香附子(l)草甘膦是更好的理解。本研究旨在评估的宽容“绿地”不同草甘膦利率之下控制环境。在一个完全是一个阶乘的安排吗随机设计(CRD)两种饲料bermudagrass品种和五个草甘膦应用程序率(0.35,0.47,0.95,1.37,和2.75磅人工智能交流−1)+参与控制。视觉损伤(VI)收集在8,16和24天后草甘膦应用程序(DAG)和干燥相对于参与再生控制问题(% DMRrel)测定在56 DAG。表明,VI在号召发起人之一龚蔚发展更快直到8 DAG,但是这两个品种都相似草甘膦VI的峰值(16 DAG)。草甘膦VI是相似的在这两个品种在16岁和24 DAG号召发起人之一龚蔚显示更大的% DMRrel草甘膦率≥0.95磅人工智能交流−1比格林菲尔德在56 DAG。%从先前的树冠DMRrel VI截然不同负指数关系品种DAG应承担的组合。标准(AICc)数值差异比较关系时可以忽略不计不同的特定品种无进取心的人。实际上,VI读数在任何评估无进取心的人被认为是适当的估算% DMRrel。草甘膦宽容是品种高依赖号召发起人之一龚蔚显示改善公差允许在非赛季草甘膦应用程序来控制杂草以更高的利率比格林菲尔德。验证我们的条件必须执行发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号