首页> 外文期刊>Wound repair and regeneration: official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society >Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements

机译:成本效益分析的一次性负面的治疗伤口敷料(sNPWT)的压力减少手术部位并发症(SSC)日常主要髋关节和膝关节置换手术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single-use negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing primary hip and knee replacements using effectiveness data from a recently completed non-blinded randomized controlled trial. A decision analytic model was developed from UK National Health Service perspective using data from a single-centre trial. 220 patients were randomized to treatment with either single-use negative pressure wound therapy or standard care i.e., film dressings of clinician choice and followed for 6 weeks. Outcomes included dressing changes, length of stay, surgical site complications, cost and quality adjusted life years. The randomized controlled trial reported a reduction in dressing changes (p = 0.002), SSC (p = 0.06) and LOS (p = 0.07) in favor of single-use negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care. The model estimated 0.116 and 0.115 QALY gained, 0.98 and 0.92 complications avoided for single-use negative pressure wound therapy and standard care, respectively. The cost/patient was 5,602 pound ($7,954) and 6,713 pound ($9,559) for single-use negative pressure wound therapy and standard care respectively resulting in cost-saving of 1,132 pound ($1,607) in favor of single-use negative pressure wound therapy. Greater savings were observed in subgroups of higher risk patients with BMI >= 35 and ASA >= 3 i.e., 7,955 pound ($11,296) and 7,248 pound ($10,293), respectively. The findings were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, single-use negative pressure wound therapy can be considered a cost saving intervention to reduce surgical site complications following primary hip and knee replacements compared with standard care. Providers should consider targeting therapy to those patients at elevated risk of surgical site complications to maximize efficiency.
机译:我们试图评估的成本效益一次性使用负压伤口治疗患者原发性髋关节和膝关节更换使用的数据有效性最近完成了破盲随机对照试验。由英国国民健康服务使用数据从一个只有角度审判。与一次性使用负压伤口治疗或标准治疗即电影的敷料临床医生选择和随访6周。结果包括着装变化,长度留下来,手术部位的并发症,成本和质量调整生命年。对照试验报告减少酱改变(p = 0.002), SSC (p = 0.06)和洛杉矶(p =0.07)一次性使用负压与标准治疗伤口治疗。模型估计的0.116和0.115 QALY, 0.98和0.92为一次性避免并发症负压伤口治疗和标准保健,分别。英镑(7954美元)和6713磅(9559美元)一次性使用负压伤口治疗和标准治疗分别导致节约成本1132英镑(1607美元)的支持一次性使用负压伤口治疗。更大的储蓄被观察到的子组高风险患者体重指数> = 35和ASA > = 3也就是说,7955英镑(11296美元)和7248英镑(分别为10293美元)。一系列的敏感性分析。结论,一次性使用负压伤口治疗可以被认为是一个成本节约干预,以减少手术部位并发症主要髋关节和膝关节替代品与标准治疗。供应商应考虑针对治疗这些患者在手术部位的风险升高并发症以最大限度地提高效率。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号