首页> 外文期刊>Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management >Does dicamba exposure elicit a hormetic response in sensitive soybean?
【24h】

Does dicamba exposure elicit a hormetic response in sensitive soybean?

机译:麦草畏暴露引起激效反应吗在敏感的大豆吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Applications of dicambaherbicide to dicamba-resistant (DR) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) may increase the risks of non-DR soybean exposure to dicamba. Dicamba residue in sprayers poses a challenge for applicatorsthat also treat non-DR soybean. Risks for non-DR soybean producers increase as the planted acreage and usage of DR crops increases, as there is potential for volatilization of the herbicide in the summer months, posing a risk for nearby non-DR soybean producers. There has been widespread speculation that a low-dose exposure of dicamba to sensitive soybean may elicit a positive response in yield or yield components of the crop. Therefore, experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 to assess the abilityof dicamba to cause a hormetic response on a sensitive soybean. Dicamba at 0.000008,0.0000125,0.000025,0.00005, and 0.0001 lb a.i. acre-1 was applied to soybean at the V3 stage along with a nontreated control. Similar treatments were applied to soybean at the R1 stage in a second experiment. In 2018, 4 out of 60 treatment means across six yield parameters had a positive response over the control, although no increase in yield was detected. In 2019, 11 out of 60 treatment means across the same yield parameters displayed a decrease and subsequently reduced soybean grain yield. The degree of auxin symptoms varied between site— years and did not consistently display compensatory effects. Overall, no findings led to the conclusion that exposure of soybeanto sublethal doses of dicamba increased grain yield.
机译:应用程序的dicambaherbicidedicamba-resistant (DR)大豆(大豆(l)稳定)和棉花(陆地棉l .)增加non-DR大豆暴露的风险麦草畏。挑战applicatorsthat也non-DR治疗大豆。增加博士的种植面积和使用作物增加,有潜力在夏天挥发的除草剂个月,附近non-DR大豆构成的风险生产商。低剂量暴露麦草畏的敏感大豆产量可能引起积极的反应或作物的产量构成。实验在2018年和2019年引起激效评估abilityof麦草畏反应在一个敏感的大豆。0.000008、0.0000125、0.000025、0.00005和0.0001磅人工智能acre-1 V3应用于大豆随着参与控制阶段。在R1治疗被用于大豆在第二个实验阶段。产量60治疗手段在6个参数在控制了积极的响应,尽管没有发现增加产量。2019年,在11个60治疗手段相同的收益率参数显示和减少随后降低大豆籽粒产量。网站之间的生长素症状不同程度年,没有一直显示补偿效果。结论soybeanto暴露亚致死剂量的麦草畏增加粮食产量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management》 |2021年第2期|Does dicamba exposure elicit-Does dicamba exposure elicit a|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Crop. Soil, and Environmental Sciences Dcp.. Univ. of Arkansas, 1366 W. Althcimcr Dr, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA;

    Univ. of Arkansas Systems Division of Agriculture. Lonoke Extension Center. 2001 Hwy. 70 E, Lonoke. AR 72086, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Dicamba; Soybeans;

    机译:None;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号