...
首页> 外文期刊>Wound repair and regeneration: official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society >Evaluation of inguinal vascular surgical scars treated with closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy using three‐dimensional digital imaging—A randomized controlled trial on bilateral incisions
【24h】

Evaluation of inguinal vascular surgical scars treated with closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy using three‐dimensional digital imaging—A randomized controlled trial on bilateral incisions

机译:评价腹股沟血管手术疤痕处理关闭切口负压使用三维数字应承担的伤口治疗想象一种随机对照试验双边切口

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose of the investigation Scar formation is an important, permanent surrogate marker for wound healing. The main aim of this randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on scar formation in uncomplicated wound healing with 3‐dimensional (3D) digital imaging. Basic procedures Patients undergoing bilateral inguinal incisions after vascular surgery were randomized to receive iNPWT and standard dressing on separate sides. The incisional scars were documented at a median time of 808 days (range 394–1194) after surgery with 3D photography, which were objectively evaluated by two plastic surgeons using the Stony Brook scar evaluation scale (SBSES) and a 10‐point graded numeric ranking scale (NRS10). Subjective evaluation was performed with the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS). Patients with surgical site infection or other wound complications were excluded to minimize bias. The p ‐values were calculated using McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test for paired nominal and paired continuous data, respectively. Main findings Among 33 patients, 32 patients had undergone endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and 31 patients had transverse inguinal incisions. Objective and subjective scar evaluation showed no difference between iNPWT and standard dressing. In objective scorings, 18.8 and 21.9% received the highest possible SBSES total score in the iNPWT and standard dressing groups, while 43.8 and 37.5% received the highest possible NRS10 score, respectively. The inter‐rater reliability between the two assessors for SBSES total score and NRS10 showed an intra‐class correlation (ICC) of 0.78 and 0.68 for NPWT and 0.70 and 0.77 for traditional dressing, respectively. Principal conclusion The present randomized trial showed that iNPWT and standard dressings on closed transverse inguinal incisions after EVAR resulted in equal subtle scar formation. Objective scar evaluation with 3D images showed good inter‐rater agreement.
机译:抽象的目的调查疤痕形成是一个重要的、永久的代理伤口愈合的标志。随机试验是评价的影响切口负压伤口治疗(iNPWT)在简单的伤口疤痕形成治疗与三维(3 d)数码影像。病人接受两国基本过程血管手术后腹股沟切口随机获得iNPWT和标准着装在不同的方面。记录在一个平均时间为808天(范围394 - 1194年),手术后3 d照片的话,客观评估的两个塑料外科医生使用石溪疤痕评估规模(sbs)和10点分级数值等级量表(NRS10)。与患者进行观察疤痕评估量表(posa)。伤口部位感染或其他并发症排除减少偏见。使用McNemar检验法和Wilcoxon计算签署了优先等级测试名义配对,配对分别连续数据。33名患者,32个病人经历了血管内主动脉瓣修复(腔内修复术)和31例横向腹股沟切口。主观的疤痕评估显示没有区别iNPWT之间和标准。获得了最高生长残痕,18.8和21.9%可能的sbs iNPWT和总分标准敷料组,而43.8和37.5%收到可能NRS10得分最高,分别。sbs的两个评估总分和NRS10显示一个内部类(ICC)的相关性为0.78NPWT和0.70和0.77和0.68传统的酱,分别。结论目前的随机试验显示iNPWT和标准敷料封闭横向腹股沟切口后腔内修复术了在平等的微妙的疤痕形成。评估3 d图像显示良好的国际米兰的评定等级协议。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号