...
首页> 外文期刊>BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal >High Court Requests CAFC Reconsider Patent Malpractice After Gunn v. Minton
【24h】

High Court Requests CAFC Reconsider Patent Malpractice After Gunn v. Minton

机译:高等法院请求CAFC考虑专利耿氏诉明顿后玩忽职守

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Supreme Court on Feb. 25 granted a petition for writ of certiorari, vacated an opinion on jurisdiction over patent attorney malpractice claims by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and remanded the case to the appeals court for further consideration (Byrne v. Wood, Herron & Evans L.L.P., U.S., No. 11-1497, review granted, decision vacated, remanded 2/25/13). The decision was unsurprising after Gunn v. Minton, No. 11-1118 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2013) (85 PTCJ 535, 2/22/13), in which the court held unanimously that patent attorneys should normally face legal malpractice claims in state court despite the exclusive grant of jurisdiction over patent claims to federal courts.
机译:最高法院于2月25日签署了一份请愿书对于复审令,空出一个意见管辖专利代理人玩忽职守美国上诉法院联邦巡回法院,并发回再审进一步考虑上诉法院(伯恩v。木头,赫伦&埃文斯L.L.P公司。美国,11 - 1497号审查批准,决定空出,归还2/25/13)。耿氏诉明顿,11号- 1118(美国2013年2月20日)(85 PTCJ 535, 2/22/13),法院举行一致,专利律师应该正常在州法院面临法律医疗事故索赔尽管管辖权的独家授权专利声称联邦法院。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号