...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics >A GROWTH-FRIENDLY SPENDING MIX? BREAKING DOWN PUBLIC SPENDING IN IRELAND
【24h】

A GROWTH-FRIENDLY SPENDING MIX? BREAKING DOWN PUBLIC SPENDING IN IRELAND

机译:有利于经济支出组合?公共开支在爱尔兰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the context of sustained improvements in Ireland's public finances since that country's fiscal crisis of 2008-2012, the scope and adequacy of public expenditures in Ireland have reemerged as a major political and social concern. In this paper, we identify the broad areas of public spending most associated with long-run economic growth. Next, we compare the aggregate level of expenditure in Ireland with euro area averages under the ten Classification of Functions of Government (COFOG) categories. We generally demonstrate under expenditure in the Irish case relative to comparators. However, there are problems arising from the use of GDP in the Irish context as well as problems with comparing spending levels in Ireland with that of the much poorer and cheaper EU countries. We therefore move to compare per capita spending in Ireland with that of similarly affluent EU countries. We find similar under spends within many public expenditure categories, some of which are likely attributable to demographic factors, such as the relative absence of elderly populations in Ireland in contrast to comparator countries. In terms of the composition of spending we find that Ireland allocates a relatively large share of its aggregate primary spend to public orderand safety, to housing and community, to education, and especially to health. However, Ireland's lower per capita primary spend of €14,502 in 2016 was just 84.7% of the peer country population weighted average of €17,112. This meant that education spending on a per pupil basis was actually lower than the peer country average. Certain areas of relative under expenditure, such as the under-expenditure on education, on per capita expenditure on gross fixed capital formation and on per capita expenditure onpublic Research and Development (R&D) are concerning from a long run growth perspective. We conclude that the limited fiscal resources should prioritize expanding productive capacity through investment in these areas along with measures such as enhancedchildcare subsidies to improve employment outcomes, equity and facilitate long run growth.
机译:在持续改善爱尔兰公共财政自那个国家2008 - 2012年的财政危机和范围充足的公共支出在爱尔兰作为一个重大的政治和社会再度出现担忧。公共支出最相关的领域长期的经济增长。支出总水平在爱尔兰欧元区平均十下分类政府的功能(COFOG)类别。一般展示在支出爱尔兰的情况相对比较器。有从GDP的使用出现的问题爱尔兰的背景以及问题比较在爱尔兰的支出水平更穷的和更便宜的欧盟国家。因此搬到比较人均支出爱尔兰与同样富裕的欧盟国家。许多公共支出类别,其中一些可能归因于人口因素,如老年人相对缺乏人口在爱尔兰与比较器国家。我们发现爱尔兰分配支出相对较大的份额总初级花公众orderand安全、住房和社区教育,尤其是健康。主要花费€14502在2016年仅为84.7%对等的国家人口加权平均€17112。每个学生的基础实际上是低于对等的国家平均水平。在支出,比如under-expenditure在教育方面,人均支出总额固定资本形成和人均支出onpublic研发(研发)是关于长期增长视角。资源应该优先考虑扩大生产能力通过投资在这些领域与enhancedchildcare补贴等措施改善就业结果,股票和促进长期经济增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号