首页> 外文期刊>BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal >'Raging Bull' Case Remanded Back To Trial Court to Examine Substantial Similarity
【24h】

'Raging Bull' Case Remanded Back To Trial Court to Examine Substantial Similarity

机译:“愤怒的公牛”案件发回更审回审判法庭检查实质性相似

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A claim that Martin Scorsese's "Raging Bull" infringed rights in a 1963 screenplay held by an heir of the screenwriter must sent back to district court to determine whether the works are substantially similar, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Aug. 22 in a decision designated as not for publication (Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 9th Cir., No. 10-55834, unpublished opinion, 8/22/14).
机译:声称,马丁·斯科塞斯的“愤怒的公牛”在1963年的剧本由一个侵犯权利编剧的继承人必须送回地方法院判定作品大体上相似,美国上诉法院第九巡回法院裁定8月22日的一个决定指定为彼得雷拉不是出版(v。米高梅公司,第九巡回法院,没有。10 - 55834,未发表意见,8/22/14)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号