...
首页> 外文期刊>Wissenschaftsrecht >Moglichkeiten internationaler Betatigung von Hochschulen nach dem General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)
【24h】

Moglichkeiten internationaler Betatigung von Hochschulen nach dem General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)

机译:Moglichkeiten国际BetatigungHochschulen新一轮贸易总协定在服务(GATS)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The internationalization is both the driving force and goal of current reforms concerning the German universities. These reforms are not only motivated by the so-called Bologna Process; they also take place against the background that education is more and more regarded as an objective of international trade. Some important legal prerequisites for international trade with education services are laid down in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). The GATS is applicable to higher-education services performed in one of the four modes of supply mentioned in Art. I para. 2, if that performance is affected by state measures such as: immigration requirements for foreign students, difficulties for foreign universities and their subsidiaries to obtain national licences to be recognized as a degree or certificate-granting educational institution, limitations of direct investments by foreign education providers, nationality requirements, needs tests, or other forms of restrictions on recruiting foreign teachers, existing government monopolies, or high subsidization of local institutions. A general obligation of WTO members under GATS is the most-favoured-nation (MFN) treat-ment which forbids discriminating between several foreign suppliers. For example, if a state has committed itself to recognize certain courses of study performed on it's market by universities of one state, it is not allowed to refuse the recognition of e^ual courses to be offered by education institutions from another state. However the GATS provides several exemptions from the general obligation to MFN treatment. For example, the member states of customs unions and free trade zones dojfiot have to share internally granted trade advantages with third states being member^'of the WTO. This is an important provision in particular for the single market ana the numerous preferential agreements of the European Union. Moreover, the WTO member states are obliged to gradually open their markets for foreign education services according to the provisions concerning market access (Art. XVI GATS) and national treatment (Art. XVII GATS). But these obligations, which must be listed in the so-called schedules of specific commitments, do not exist automatically; they must be negotiated in each single case. Nevertheless, the actual schedules reveal that many states already allow foreign suppliers of higher-education services to be active on their markets. The German universities should use the chances and possibilities to take a stand on these markets. This would enhance the scientific exchange in favour of the domestic education institutions, oppose the increasing Northern American hegemony in the field of research and teaching, and finally, bring an export of cultural achievements and characteristics of Germany and "Old Europe" to the rest of the world.
机译:国际化的驱动力关于德国和目标当前的改革大学。出于所谓的博洛尼亚进程;大背景下发生的教育越来越被视为一个国际贸易的目标。国际贸易法律的先决条件教育服务的一般《服务贸易协议》(GATS)。适用于高等教育服务执行供应的四个模式之一中提到的艺术。影响国家的措施如:移民要求外国学生,对外国大学和他们的困难子公司获得国家许可公认的学位或certificate-granting教育机构,直接的局限性投资外国教育提供者,国籍需求,需要测试,或者其他形式的限制招聘外国教师,现有的政府垄断,或高当地机构的补助。世贸组织成员在服务贸易总协定义务是最惠国(MFN)处理一些外国之间禁止歧视供应商。自己认识到某些课程的学习进行市场的大学状态,不得拒绝承认e ^ ual课程提供的从另一个国家教育机构。然而,GATS提供了一些豁免最惠国待遇的一般义务。的成员国海关工会和自由贸易区dojfiot内部分享获得贸易优势与第三国家^的世贸组织成员。提供单一市场特别是安娜众多的优惠协议欧盟。有义务逐步开放他们的市场吗根据外国教育服务规定市场准入(艺术。服务贸易总协定)和国民待遇(艺术。但这些义务,必须列入所谓的具体承诺的时间表,不存在自动;在每个情况下谈判。实际进度显示,许多州了允许外国供应商的高等教育服务活动在他们的市场。德国大学应该使用和机会站在这些市场的可能性。这将提高科学交流支持国内教育机构,反对增加北部美国霸权领域的研究和教学最后,把出口的文化成就德国和特点和“老欧洲”世界上的其他国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号