...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI >Comparison between elecsys HBsAg II and architect HBsAg QT assays for quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus
【24h】

Comparison between elecsys HBsAg II and architect HBsAg QT assays for quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus

机译:对比elecsys HBsAg二世和建筑师HBsAg QT化验乙肝的量化表面抗原在患者合并感染艾滋病毒和乙型肝炎病毒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification has been steadily gaining interest as a clinical marker of therapeutic efficacy, for which two commercial assays are currently available: Architect HBsAg QT (Architect) and Elecsys HBsAg II (Elecsys). HBsAg quantification was evaluated using both assays in 126 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)- coinfected patients initiating treatment with tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate. Linear regression and correlation were used to establish the relationship between the two methods. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine mean between-assay difference and limits of agreement (LOA) (±2 standard deviations [SD]) both overall and stratified on HBV (hepatitis B envelope antigen [HBeAg] status, replication, genotype, HBV mutants) or HIV (CD4 + cell count) cofactors. There was a significant correlation between Elecsys and Architect assays (correlation coefficient, r = 0.959; P0.001). HBsAg quantification using the Elecsys assay was on average 0.200 log 10 IU/ml (LOA,-0.500, 0.800) higher than that using Architect, which was consistent across levels of CD4 + cell count, presence of precore and YMDD mutations, and HBeAg status. A slightly larger mean between-assay difference was observed with genotypes A and G (0.196 and 0.201, respectively) versus HBV genotypes D and E (0.036 and 0.030, respectively). Mutations on the S region at position s120/s145 were the only determinant in which the mean between-assay difference in HBsAg quantification was lower than the null value (-0.078). In conclusion, the Elecsys assay, with automatic on-board dilution, is capable of quantifying serum HBsAg levels in HIV-HBV-coinfected patients, with very high correlation with the Architect assay.
机译:乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)量化一直在稳步获得临床兴趣吗治疗效果的标志,两个商业分析是目前可用的:建筑师HBsAg QT(架构师)和Elecsys HBsAg二世(Elecsys)。使用这两种分析126年人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)合并感染患者开始治疗替诺福韦伟延胡索酸酯。被用于建立和相关性这两种方法之间的关系。Bland-Altman分析来确定意味着between-assay区别和限制的协议(贷款)(±2个标准差(SD))整体和分层乙肝病毒(乙型肝炎包被抗原(e抗原)状态,复制,基因型、乙肝病毒突变体)或艾滋病毒(CD4 +细胞计数)代数余子式。Elecsys和建筑师之间化验(相关性系数,r = 0.959;使用Elecsys分析是量化平均0.200日志10国际单位/毫升(贷款,-0.500,0.800)高于使用架构师,这是一致的CD4 +细胞计数水平,precore和YMDD突变、e抗原的地位。观察不同基因型和G(分别为0.196和0.201)和乙型肝炎病毒基因型D和E(0.036和0.030,分别)。位置s120 / s145是唯一决定因素这意味着between-assay HBsAg的区别量化低于零值(-0.078)。车载自动稀释,有能力量化血清HBsAg的水平HIV-HBV-coinfected患者,非常高相关性与建筑师化验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号