...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine >Prebiotic supplementation in full-term neonates: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Prebiotic supplementation in full-term neonates: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机译:足月新生儿的生命起源以前的补充:a系统的随机对照检查试用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of prebiotic supplementation in full-term neonates. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and proceedings of relevant conferences. STUDY SELECTION: Eleven of 24 identified trials (n = 1459) were eligible for inclusion. Intervention Trials comparing formula milk supplemented with or without prebiotics, commenced at or before age 28 days and continued for 2 weeks or longer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stool colony counts (bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and pathogens), pH, consistency, frequency, anthropometry, and symptoms of intolerance. RESULTS: Six trials reported significant increases and 2 reported a trend toward increases in bifidobacteria counts after supplementation. Meta-analysis estimated significant reduction in stool pH in infants who received prebiotic supplementation (weighted mean difference, -0.65; 95% confidence interval, -0.76 to -0.54; 6 trials). Infants who receive a supplement had slightly better weight gain than did controls (weighted mean difference, 1.07 g; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.99; 4 trials) with softer and frequent stools similar to breastfed infants. All but 1 trial reported that prebiotic supplementation was well tolerated. In that trial, diarrhea (18% vs 4%; P = .008), irritability (16% vs 4%; P = .03), and eczema (18% vs 7%; P = .046) were reported more frequently by parents of infants who received prebiotic supplements. CONCLUSIONS: Prebiotic-supplemented formula is well tolerated by full-term infants. It increases stool colony counts of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and results in stools similar to those of breastfed neonates without affecting weight gain. Larger trials with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether these short-term benefits are sustained.
机译:目的:系统综述随机对照试验评估疗效和安全的生命起源以前的补充在足月新生儿。对照试验、MEDLINE、EMBASE, CINAHL数据库和程序相关的会议。确定试验(n = 1459)资格包容。牛奶有或没有补充益生元,在年龄28天或之前,继续开始2周或更长时间。凳子菌落计数(双歧杆菌,乳酸杆菌和病原体)、pH值、一致性、频率、人体测量学和症状不宽容。显著增加和2报道一种趋势在双歧杆菌数量增加补充。显著减少在婴儿粪便的pH值收到了生命起源以前的补充(加权平均数差异,-0.65;-0.54;补充了略增重比控制(加权平均差,1.07克;95%置信区间,0.14 - -1.99;柔软和频繁的凳子相似母乳喂养的婴儿。生命起源以前的补充是耐受性良好。试验、腹泻(18% vs 4%;易怒(16% vs 4%;(18% vs 7%;经常被父母的婴儿生命起源以前的补充剂。Prebiotic-supplemented公式是耐受性良好足月的婴儿。双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌的数量导致大便类似母乳喂养新生儿不影响体重增加。试验与长期随访是必要的确定是否这些短期收益持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号