...
首页> 外文期刊>Country Commerce: Venezuela >Intellectual property and e-commerce
【24h】

Intellectual property and e-commerce

机译:知识产权和电子商务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Venezuelan legislation has traditionally distinguished between intellectual-property rights (IPR) and industrial-property rights. The former include literature, graphic arts, and audio and visual productions, which are protected by the 1993 Copyright Law. The latter include patents and trademarks and had been guaranteed by Decision 486/2000 of the Andean Community (Comunidad Andina-CAN) until Venezuela exited the bloc in 2011. Venezuela's departure from CAN threw the country's industrial-property regime into considerable confusion. CAN legislation had long governed intellectual- and industrial-property rights, bringing Venezuela closer to compliance with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of the World Trade Organisation. Venezuela's exit from CAN meant a return to the previous IPR regime, based on Venezuela's Industrial Property Law of 1955. In practice, however, this has resulted in the collapse of any effective patent and trademark regime.
机译:委内瑞拉法律传统上区分知识产权权利(IPR)和工业产权的权利。前包括文学、平面艺术,音频和视觉作品,受到保护1993年版权法。专利和商标和担保决定安第斯共同体的486/2000(Comunidad Andina-CAN),直到委内瑞拉退出了2011年集团。把整个国家的工业产权制度成相当大的混乱。长知识,治理工业产权的权利,使委内瑞拉接近遵守协议与贸易有关的知识产权的各个方面世界贸易组织的权利(TRIPS)。委内瑞拉的退出意味着返回以前的知识产权制度,基于委内瑞拉1955年的工业产权法律。然而,这导致的崩溃有效的专利和商标的政权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号