...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine >Physiologic monitoring practices during pediatric procedural sedation: A report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium
【24h】

Physiologic monitoring practices during pediatric procedural sedation: A report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium

机译:在小儿生理监测实践程序镇静:儿科的一份报告镇静研究联盟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To describe the frequency of different physiologic monitoring modalities and combinations of modalities used during pediatric procedural sedation; to describe how physiologic monitoring varies among different classes of patients, health care providers (ie, ranging from anesthesiologists to emergency medicine physicians to nurse practitioners), procedures, and sedative medications employed; and to determine the proportion of sedations meeting published guidelines for physiologic monitoring. Design: This was a prospective, observational study from September 1, 2007, through March 31, 2011. Setting: Data were collected in areas outside of the operating room, such as intensive care units, radiology, emergency departments, and clinics. Participants: Thirty-seven institutions comprise the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium that prospectively collects data on procedural sedation/anesthesia performed outside of the operating room in all children up to age 21 years. Main Outcome Measures : Data including demographics, procedure performed, provider level, adverse events, medications, and physiologic monitors used are entered into a web-based system. Results: Data from 114 855 subjects were collected and analyzed. The frequency of use of each physiologic monitoring modality by health care provider type, medication used, and procedure performed varied significantly. The largest difference in frequency of monitoring use was seen between providers using electrocardiography (13%-95%); the smallest overall differences were seen in monitoring use based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications (1%-10%). Guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists for nonanesthesiologists were adhered to for 52% of subjects. Conclusions: A large degree of variability exists in the use of physiologic monitoring modalities for pediatric procedural sedation. Differences in monitoring are evident between sedation providers, medications, procedures, and patient types.
机译:目的:描述不同的频率生理监测模式和在儿科的组合形式程序镇静;监控类的不同而不同病人,卫生保健提供者(例如,从麻醉医师对急诊医学医生护士),程序,和镇静药物使用;会议确定的比例镇静发布指导方针,生理监测。设计:这是一个前瞻性观察研究从2007年9月1日,3月31日2011. 外的手术室,如密集医疗单位、放射学、应急部门,诊所。包括小儿镇静的研究财团,前瞻性地收集数据程序镇静/麻醉外执行手术室的所有年龄的儿童21年。人口统计数据,程序执行时,提供者水平,不良事件,药物,和进入一个生理监测使用基于网络的系统。受试者被收集和分析。每个生理监测的使用频率形态由卫生保健提供者类型、药物使用,程序执行多样显著。监测使用频率之间供应商使用心电描记法(13% - -95%);最小的总体差异被认为监控用的美国社会麻醉医师分类(1% - -10%)。美国发布的指导方针美国急诊儿科医生和美国社会的麻醉医师对nonanesthesiologists坚持52%的主题。变化很大程度上存在于使用对小儿生理监测模式程序镇静。明显的镇静提供者之间,病人药物、过程和类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号