...
首页> 外文期刊>Nanoscale >Can two-step ablation combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes achieve better outcome than traditional RF ablation? A solid tumor animal study
【24h】

Can two-step ablation combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes achieve better outcome than traditional RF ablation? A solid tumor animal study

机译:两步消融结合吗化疗脂质体取得更好的结果比传统的射频消融?动物研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To determine whether two-step ablation using sequential low and high temperature heating can achieve improved outcomes in animal tumor models when combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes (LP). Materials and methods: Balb/c mice bearing 4T1 tumor received paclitaxel-loaded liposomes followed 24 h later by either traditional RFA (70 °C, 5 min) or a low temperature RFA (45 °C, 5 min), or two-step RFA (45 °C 2 min + 70 °C 3 min). Intratumoral drug accumulation and bio-distribution in major organs were evaluated. Periablational drug penetration was evaluated by pathologic staining and the intratumoral interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) was measured directly. For long-term outcomes, mice bearing 4T1 or H22 tumors were randomized into five groups (n = 8 per group): control (no treatment), RFA alone, LP + RFA (45 °C), LP + RFA (70 °C) and LP + RFA (45 + 70 °C). End-point survivals were compared among the different groups. Results: The greater intratumoral drug accumulation (3.35 ± 0.32 vs. 3.79 ± 0.29 × 108 phot/cm2/s at 24 h, p = 0.09), deeper periablational drug penetration (45.7 ± 5.0 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), and reduced off-target drug deposition in major organs (liver 96.1 ± 31.6 vs. 47.4 ± 1.5 × 106 phot/cm2/s, p < 0.001) were found when combined with RFA (45 °C) compared to drug alone. For long-term outcomes, 4T1 tumor growth rates for LP + two-step RFA (45 + 70 °C) were significantly slower than those of LP + RFA (70 °C), LP + RFA (45 °C), and RFA alone (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). End point survival for LP + RFA (45 + 70 °C) was also longer than that for LP + RFA (70 °C) (median 16 vs. 10 days, p = 0.003) or LP + RFA 45 °C (11 days, p = 0.009) and RFA alone (8.3 days, p < 0.001) in 4T1 tumor models. The intratumoral IFP after RFA (45 °C) was significantly lower than baseline RFA (3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 19.2 ± 3.1 mmHg, p < 0.001), but was not measurable after RFA (70 °C). Conclusions: A two-step ablation combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes can achieve better survival benefit compared to traditional RFA in animal models.
机译:目的:确定是否两步消融使用连续低温和高温加热可以达到更好的结果在动物肿瘤与化疗相结合的模型脂质体(LP)。老鼠收到paclitaxel-loaded轴承4 t1肿瘤脂质体后24 h后通过传统RFA(70°C, 5分钟)或低温度RFA(45°C, 5分钟),或两步RFA(45°C 2分钟+ 70°C 3分钟)。主要器官的积累和生物分布进行了评估。由病理染色和评估瘤内孔隙流体压力(奖学金)直接测量。轴承4 t1或小鼠H22肿瘤被随机分配分成五组每组(n = 8):控制(没有(70°C)和LP + RFA(45 + 70°C)。由不同的比较组。积累(3.35±0.32和3.79±0.29×108辐透在24小时/厘米2 / s, p = 0.09),更深periablational药物渗透(45.7±5.0 vs。1.6±0.5,p < 0.001),减少非标靶药物沉积主要器官(肝脏96.1±31.6 vs 47.4 phot±1.5×106 / cm / s, p < 0.001%)被发现时结合RFA(45°C)相比单独药物。4 t1肿瘤增长率LP +两步RFA (45+ 70°C)明显比慢拉里·佩奇+ RFA(70°C),拉里·佩奇+ RFA(45°C),, and RFA简称《所有的比较(P < 0.01)。生存LP + RFA(45 + 70°C)也长比LP + RFA(70°C)(中值16与10天,p = 0.003)或LP + RFA 45°C (11天,p = 0.009)和单独RFA(8.3天,p <0.001)在4 t1肿瘤模型。RFA后明显低于(45°C)基线RFA(3.3±0.8和19.2±3.1毫米汞柱,p <0.001),但没有可衡量的RFA后(70°C)。结论:一个两步消融结合化疗脂质体可以达到更好相比传统RFA获益动物模型。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号