首页> 外文期刊>Survey of anesthesiology >Teaching Aseptic Technique for Central Venous Access Under Ultrasound Guidance: A Randomized Trial Comparing Didactic Training Alone to Didactic Plus Simulation-Based Training
【24h】

Teaching Aseptic Technique for Central Venous Access Under Ultrasound Guidance: A Randomized Trial Comparing Didactic Training Alone to Didactic Plus Simulation-Based Training

机译:在超声指导下用于中央静脉通道的教学无菌技术:一项随机试验,将教学训练与教学训练和基于模拟的培训进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adverse outcomes associated with placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) include bloodstream infections (BSIs), which cause increased length of stay in the intensive care unit (by 2.41 days) and longer length of hospital stay (by 7.54 days). Mortality rates attributed to CVC-BSIs range from 0% to 25%. Poor compliance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the placement of CVCs may be one cause. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services now list a CVC-associated infection as a preventable hospital-acquired infection. Despite these statistics and measures, compliance has not improved over the past 30 years. This goal of this study was to determine whether simulation combined with didactic training would improve sterile technique during ultrasound (US)-guided CVC insertion compared with didactic training alone among novices and whether after simulation training novices would perform similarly to experienced residents.
机译:与放置中央静脉导管(CVC)相关的不良结局包括血流感染(BSIS),这会导致重症监护病房的住院时间增加(增加2.41天)和更长的住院时间(降低7.54天)。 归因于CVC-BSIS的死亡率范围为0%至25%。 不良遵守疾病控制和预防指南的CVC的指南可能是一个原因之一。 此外,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心现在将与CVC相关的感染列为可预防的医院获得感染。 尽管采取了这些统计和措施,但在过去30年中,合规性仍未提高。 这项研究的这一目标是确定与单独的教学训练相比,与单独的教学训练相比,在超声(US)指导的CVC插入过程中,模拟与教学训练相比是否会改善无菌技术,以及在模拟训练之后,是否会与经验丰富的居民进行类似的表现。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号