...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral and experimental economics >Groups and trust: Experimental evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses
【24h】

Groups and trust: Experimental evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses

机译:团体和信任:关于奥尔森和普特南假设的实验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Mancur Olson and Robert Putnam provide two conflicting views on the effect of involvement with voluntary associations on their members. Putnam argues that associations instill in their members habits of cooperation, solidarity and public spiritedness. Olson emphasizes the tendency of groups to pursue private interests and lobby for preferential policies. We carry out the first field experiment involving a sample of members of different association types from different age groups and education levels, as well as a demographically comparable sample of non-members. This enables us to examine the differential patterns of behavior followed by members of Putnam-type and Olson-type associations. Coherently with both the Putnam's and Olson's view, we find that members of Putnam-type (Olson-type) associations display more (no more) generalized trust than non-members. However, when we examine trustworthy behavior we find the opposite pattern, with members of Olson-type (Putnam-type) associations more (no more) trustworthy than non-members. No systematic effect for the intensity of participation in associations emerges. We analyze the issue of self-selection through a structural equation model. This supports the view that membership has a significant effect on prosociality. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:曼库尔·奥尔森(Mancur Olson)和罗伯特·普特南(Robert Putnam)就参与自愿协会对其成员的影响提供了两种矛盾的观点。普特南(Putnam)认为,协会灌输了其成员的合作,团结和公众充满活力的习惯。奥尔森(Olson)强调团体追求私人利益和游说优先政策的趋势。我们进行了第一个现场实验,涉及来自不同年龄组和教育水平的不同关联类型的样本,以及非会员的人口统计学样本。这使我们能够检查putnam-type和Olson型关联的成员之后的行为差异模式。与普特南(Putnam)和奥尔森(Olson)的观点相辅相成,我们发现普特南型(Olson-type)协会的成员比非会员更多地显示(不再)广义信任。但是,当我们检查值得信赖的行为时,我们发现了相反的模式,而Olson-type(Putnam-type)协会的成员比非会员更值得信赖。没有出现对参与协会强度的系统效应。我们通过结构方程模型分析自我选择问题。这支持会员资格对亲社会有重大影响的观点。 (c)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号