...
首页> 外文期刊>JCO oncology practice. >Physician Influence on Variation in Receipt of Aggressive End-of-Life Care Among Women Dying of Ovarian Cancer
【24h】

Physician Influence on Variation in Receipt of Aggressive End-of-Life Care Among Women Dying of Ovarian Cancer

机译:医师对死于卵巢癌的妇女接收侵略性终止护理的影响的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE End-of-life care for women with ovarian cancer is persistently aggressive, but factors associated with overuse are not well understood. We evaluated physician-level variation in receipt of aggressive end-of-life care and examined physician-level factors contributing to this variation in the SEER-Medicare data set.METHODS Medicare beneficiaries with ovarian cancer who died between 2000 and 2016 were included if they were diagnosed after age 66 years, had complete Medicare coverage between diagnosis and death, and had outpatient physician evaluation and management for their ovarian cancer. Using multilevel logistic regression, we examined physician variation in no hospice enrollment, late hospice enrollment ( 1 emergency department visit, an intensive care unit stay, terminal hospitalization, > 1 hospitalization, receiving a life-extending or invasive procedure, and chemotherapy (in the last 2 weeks).RESULTS In this sample of 6,288 women, 51% of women received at least one form of aggressive end-of-life care. Most common were no hospice enrollment (28.9%), an intensive care unit stay (18.6%), and receipt of an invasive procedure (20.7%). For not enrolling in hospice, 9.9% of variation was accounted for by physician clustering (P < .01). Chemotherapy had the highest physician variation (12.4%), with no meaningful portion of the variation explained by physician specialty, volume, region, or patient characteristics.CONCLUSION In this study, a meaningful amount of variation in aggressive end-of-life care among women dying of ovarian cancer was at the physician level, suggesting that efforts to improve the quality of this care should include interventions aimed at physician practices and decision making in end-of-life care.
机译:卵巢癌女性的目的终止护理持续侵略性,但与过度使用相关的因素尚不清楚。我们评估了医师水平的差异在接收积极的临终护理方面,并检查了医师水平的因素,导致Seer-Medicare数据集的这种差异。在66岁之后被诊断出,在诊断和死亡之间进行了完全的医疗保险范围,并且对其卵巢癌进行了门诊医师的评估和管理。使用多级逻辑回归,我们检查了无临终关怀注册,晚期临终关怀入学率( 1个急诊科访问,重症监护室住院,终止住院,> 1住院,接受生命延长或入侵程序的医师差异,以及化学疗法(在过去的两周中)。在这份6,288名妇女样本中,有51%的妇女至少接受了一种积极的生命终止护理。最常见的是没有临终关怀的入学率(28.9%),重症监护病房(18.6%)和侵入性手术(20.7%)。由于不参加临终关怀,医师聚类占9.9%的变异(p <.01)。化学疗法的医师差异最高(12.4%),没有有意义的差异部分由医师的专业,体积,区域或患者特征解释。判断中的判断,在侵略性终止护理中的有意义的差异有意义死于卵巢癌的妇女处于医生一级,这表明改善这种护理质量的努力应包括针对医师实践和临终护理决策的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号