...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cognitive enhancement >What Versus How in Visual Search: Effects of Object Recognition Training, Strategy Training, and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Satellite Image Search
【24h】

What Versus How in Visual Search: Effects of Object Recognition Training, Strategy Training, and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Satellite Image Search

机译:在视觉搜索中如何与什么相对:对象识别训练,策略培训和非侵入性脑刺激对卫星图像搜索的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Visual search is required in many professions where an undetected threat, such as a weapon, can put the well-being of others at risk. Given the importance of detecting these threats, researchers have used various experimental techniques to improve performance in visual search tasks, albeit with varying degrees of success. Here, we explore two promising techniques to improve visual search using ecologically valid synthetic aperture radar stimuli: object recognition training and search strategy training. Search strategy training is intended to make observers search more systematically through a display, whereas object recognition training is intended to improve observers' ability to recognize critical targets. Search strategy training was implemented by instructing participants to scan through the display in a pre-specified pattern. Object recognition training was implemented by having participants discriminate between targets and non-targets. We also manipulated whether observers received anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during training, which has been shown to improve visual search performance and target learning. To measure the effectiveness of the training and stimulation conditions, we tested object recognition accuracy and overall visual search performance before and after three sessions of increasingly difficult training. Results indicated that object recognition training significantly improved object recognition accuracy relative to the search strategy group, whereas search strategy training was effective in improving visual search accuracy in those who adhered to the training. However, tDCS did not interact with training type, and although both training types yielded significant improvements, training-related improvements were not significantly different between the different approaches. This evidence suggests that strategy-based training could be as effective as the more prototypical object recognition training. Implications for future training protocols are discussed.
机译:在许多专业中,需要进行视觉搜索,因为未被发现的威胁(例如武器)可以使他人的福祉处于危险之中。鉴于检测这些威胁的重要性,研究人员使用了各种实验技术来提高视觉搜索任务的性能,尽管成功程度不同。在这里,我们探索了两种有前途的技术,可以使用生态有效的合成孔径刺激来改善视觉搜索:对象识别训练和搜索策略培训。搜索策略培训旨在使观察者通过显示更系统地搜索,而对象识别培训旨在提高观察者识别关键目标的能力。通过指示参与者以预先指定的模式扫描显示器,可以实现搜索策略培训。通过让参与者区分目标和非目标来实施对象识别培训。我们还操纵观察者是否在训练过程中接受了阳极或假经颅直流电流刺激(TDC),这已被证明可以改善视觉搜索性能和目标学习。为了衡量训练和刺激条件的有效性,我们测试了对象识别的准确性和整体视觉搜索性能,并在三个越来越困难的训练中进行了和之后。结果表明,相对于搜索策略组,对象识别培训显着提高了对象识别精度,而搜索策略培训可有效提高遵守培训的人的视觉搜索准确性。但是,TDC没有与训练类型相互作用,尽管两种训练类型都取得了重大改进,但与培训相关的改进在不同方法之间并没有显着差异。该证据表明,基于策略的培训可能与更原型的对象识别培训一样有效。讨论了对未来培训方案的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号