...
首页> 外文期刊>AEM Education and Training. >Differences in Gaze Fixation Location and Duration Between Resident and Fellowship Sonographers Interpreting a Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma
【24h】

Differences in Gaze Fixation Location and Duration Between Resident and Fellowship Sonographers Interpreting a Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma

机译:凝视固定位置的差异和居民和奖学金的超声师之间的持续时间,解释了以超声检查的重点评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: We quantified the gaze fixation duration of resident and fellowship sonographers interpreting a prerecorded focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST). We hypothesized that all sonographers would fixate on each relevant anatomic relationship but that the duration of fixation would differ. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study collecting and analyzing the gaze fixations of a convenience sample of current resident and fellowship sonographers. All sonographers viewed a standardized FAST video, and their gaze fixations were recorded using a Tobii X3-120 eye-tracking bar. Gaze fixations over nine anatomic regions of interest (ROIs) were identified. These were assessed for normality and analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test at an alpha of 0.05 and Bonferroni correction p value of <0.0034. The chi-square test and Pearson's correlation were performed to assess statistical association. Results: The gaze fixation recordings of 24 resident and eight fellowship sonographers were suitable for analysis. Fourteen of the 24 resident sonographers viewed all ROIs in the FAST, whereas all eight fellowship sonographers viewed each of the nine relevant ROIs. Five ROIs were identified over which at least one resident sonographer did not have a gaze fixation. No statistically significant difference was identified between groups. Resident sonographers gaze fixated over the left upper quadrant (LUQ) splenorenal interface for a median (interquartile range) of 10.64 (9.73-11.60) seconds. The fellowship group viewed the same ROI for 8.43 (6.64-8.95) seconds (p < 0.003). All participants viewed this ROI. No other ROIs had a statistical difference.
机译:目的:我们量化了居民和奖学金的超声师的凝视固定时间,用创伤中的超声检查来解释预先录制的重点评估(FAST)。我们假设所有超声检查员都将固定在每个相关的解剖关系上,但是固定持续时间会有所不同。方法:我们进行了一项横断面研究,以收集和分析当前居民和研究金超声师的便利样本的注视固定。所有超声检查员都观看了标准化的快速视频,并使用Tobii X3-120眼线杆记录了他们的凝视固定镜头。确定了九个感兴趣的解剖区域(ROI)的凝视固定。这些评估了正态性,并使用Wilcoxon秩和在0.05的α和Bonferroni校正P值<0.0034的alpha中进行了分析。进行卡方检验和皮尔逊的相关性以评估统计关联。结果:24名居民和八名奖学金超声师的凝视记录适合分析。 24名居民超声师中有14名在斋戒中查看了所有ROI,而所有八个奖学金的超声演奏者都查看了九个相关的Rois中的每一个。发现了五个ROI,至少有一名居民超声师没有注视。两组之间未发现统计学上的显着差异。居民超声检查员凝视着左上象限(LUQ)脾脏界面的中位数(四分位间距)为10.64(9.73-11.60)秒。奖学金小组查看了8.43(6.64-8.95)秒的相同ROI(p <0.003)。所有参与者都查看了此ROI。没有其他ROI有统计差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号