首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Methods >A Unified Framework of Longitudinal Models to Examine Reciprocal Relations
【24h】

A Unified Framework of Longitudinal Models to Examine Reciprocal Relations

机译:纵向模型的统一框架,以检查相互关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

abstract_textpInferring reciprocal effects or causality between variables is a central aim of behavioral and psychological research. To address reciprocal effects, a variety of longitudinal models that include cross-lagged relations have been proposed in different contexts and disciplines. However, the relations between these cross-lagged models have not been systematically discussed in the literature. This lack of insight makes it difficult for researchers to select an appropriate model when analyzing longitudinal data, and some researchers do not even think about alternative cross-lagged models. The present research provides a unified framework that clarifies the conceptual and mathematical similarities and differences between these models. The unified framework shows that existing longitudinal models can be effectively classified based on whether the model posits unique factors and/or dynamic residuals and what types of common factors are used to model changes. The latter is essential to understand how cross-lagged parameters are interpreted. We also present an example using empirical data to demonstrate that there is great risk of drawing different conclusions depending on the cross-lagged models used./p/abstract_text
机译:& Abstract_text&& p&推断变量之间的相互影响或因果关系是行为和心理学研究的核心目的。为了解决相互影响,在不同的情况和学科中提出了包括跨滞后关系的各种纵向模型。但是,在文献中尚未系统地讨论这些交叉滞后模型之间的关系。缺乏洞察力使研究人员在分析纵向数据时很难选择适当的模型,而且一些研究人员甚至没有考虑替代性交叉滞后模型。本研究提供了一个统一的框架,阐明了这些模型之间的概念和数学相似性和差异。统一的框架表明,现有的纵向模型可以根据模型是否提出独特因素和/或动态残差以及使用哪些类型的常见因素来有效地分类。后者对于了解如何解释交叉滞后参数至关重要。我们还提供了一个使用经验数据来证明的示例,表明根据所使用的交叉滞后模型,有很大的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号