...
首页> 外文期刊>Obesity reviews: an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity >Long-term effectiveness of diet-plus-exercise interventions vs. diet-only interventions for weight loss: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Long-term effectiveness of diet-plus-exercise interventions vs. diet-only interventions for weight loss: a meta-analysis.

机译:饮食加强干预措施与仅饮食减轻饮食干预措施的长期有效性:一项荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Diet and exercise are two of the commonest strategies to reduce weight. Whether a diet-plus-exercise intervention is more effective for weight loss than a diet-only intervention in the long-term has not been conclusively established. The objective of this study was to systemically review the effect of diet-plus-exercise interventions vs. diet-only interventions on both long-term and short-term weight loss. Studies were retrieved by searching MEDLINE and Cochrane Library (1966 - June 2008). Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of diet-plus-exercise interventions vs. diet-only interventions on weight loss for a minimum of 6 months among obese or overweight adults. Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted by two investigators using a standardized protocol. We found that the overall standardized mean differences between diet-plus-exercise interventions and diet-only interventions at the end of follow-up were -0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]-0.36 to -0.14), with a P-value for heterogeneity of 0.4. Because there were two outcome measurements, weight (kg) and body mass index (kg m(-2)), we also stratified the results by weight and body mass index outcome. The pooled weight loss was 1.14 kg (95% CI 0.21 to 2.07) or 0.50 kg m(-2) (95% CI 0.21 to 0.79) greater for the diet-plus-exercise group than the diet-only group. We did not detect significant heterogeneity in either stratum. Even in studies lasting 2 years or longer, diet-plus-exercise interventions provided significantly greater weight loss than diet-only interventions. In summary, a combined diet-plus-exercise programme provided greater long-term weight loss than a diet-only programme. However, both diet-only and diet-plus-exercise programmes are associated with partial weight regain, and future studies should explore better strategies to limit weight regain and achieve greater long-term weight loss.
机译:饮食和运动是减轻体重的最常见策略之一。尚未确定长期的饮食加入干预对体重减轻的有效性比仅限饮食干预更有效。这项研究的目的是系统地回顾饮食加强干预措施与仅饮食干预措施对长期体重和短期体重减轻的影响。通过搜索Medline和Cochrane图书馆(1966年至2008年6月)检索了研究。如果它们是随机对照试验,将研究与饮食加强干预措施的影响相比,肥胖成年人至少6个月,将研究纳入研究。十八项研究符合我们的纳入标准。数据是由两名研究人员使用标准化协议独立提取的。我们发现,随访结束时,饮食加上运动干预措施和仅饮食干预措施之间的总体标准化平均差异为-0.25(95%置信区间[CI] -0.36至-0.14),pValue pValue均为-0.36至-0.14)。异质性为0.4。由于有两项结果测量值,体重(kg)和体重指数(kg m(-2)),我们还根据体重和体重指数结果对结果进行了分层。合并的体重减轻为1.14千克(95%CI 0.21至2.07)或0.50 kg m(-2)(-2)(95%CI 0.21至0.79),饮食加上运动组大于饮食组。我们均未检测到这两个层的显着异质性。即使在持续2年或更长时间的研究中,饮食加运动的干预措施也比仅限饮食干预措施提供了明显更大的体重减轻。总而言之,一项饮食加入式计划的组合提供了比饮食中的饮食计划更大的长期体重减轻。但是,仅饮食和饮食加饮食措施计划都与部分体重恢复有关,未来的研究应探索更好的策略,以限制体重恢复并实现更大的长期体重减轻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号