...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. >Anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus D (RhD)-negative women having an abortion of a pregnancy up to 13(+6) weeks' gestation: a systematic review and new NICE consensus guidelines
【24h】

Anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus D (RhD)-negative women having an abortion of a pregnancy up to 13(+6) weeks' gestation: a systematic review and new NICE consensus guidelines

机译:恒河猴D(RHD)的抗D预防症患者流产至13(+6)周的妊娠:妊娠:系统评价和新的NICE共识指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background In order to develop the 2019 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) national guideline on abortion care for the National Health Service1 we undertook a systematic review comparing anti-D prophylaxis to no prophylaxis in rhesus D (RhD)-negative women undergoing medical or surgical abortion of pregnancy at <= 13(+6) weeks' gestation Methods We searched Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library on 19 October 2018. We also consulted experts and checked reference lists for any missed trials. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials and non-randomised comparative studies, published in English from 1985 onwards, comparing anti-D prophylaxis to no anti-D prophylaxis in RhD-negative women undergoing medical or surgical abortion at <= 13(+6) weeks' gestation, and reporting subsequent anti-D isoimmunisation/sensitisation or subsequent affected pregnancy. These outcomes were to be analysed as risk ratios in Review Manager 5.3 using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and a fixed or random effect model. The overall quality of the evidence was planned to be assessed using GRADE. Results The search identified 426 potentially relevant studies of which none met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations for practice were therefore based on the clinical expertise of the guideline committee. Conclusions (1) Offer anti-D prophylaxis to women who are Rhesus D negative who are having an abortion after 10(+0) weeks' gestation. (2) Do not offer anti-D prophylaxis to women who are having a medical abortion up to and including 10(+0) weeks' gestation. (3) Consider anti-D prophylaxis for women who are rhesus D negative and are having a surgical abortion up to and including 10(+0) weeks' gestation.
机译:背景为了开发2019年国家卫生与护理卓越研究所(NICE)国家卫生服务堕胎护理指南1,我们进行了系统的审查,将抗D预防性与恒河猴D(RHD)的无预防性进行了比较<= 13(+6)周的妊娠妊娠方法的妊娠方法我们于2018年10月19日搜索了Embase,Medline和Cochrane图书馆。我们还咨询了任何错过试验的专家和检查参考列表。符合条件的研究是1985年以来在英语中发表的随机对照试验和非随机比较研究,将抗D预防性与<= 13(+6)周的医学或手术流产的RHD阴性妇女中的无抗D预防进行了比较。妊娠和报告随后的抗D同源化/致敏或随后受影响的妊娠。这些结果应使用Mantel-Haenszel统计方法和固定或随机效应模型在Review Manager 5.3中作为风险比率分析。计划使用等级评估证据的总体质量。结果该搜索确定了426项潜在的相关研究,没有符合纳入标准。因此,实践建议是基于指南委员会的临床专业知识。结论(1)为在10(+0)周妊娠后流产的恒河猴D负面的女性提供抗D预防。 (2)不为患有医疗流产的妇女提供抗D预防,包括10(+0)周的妊娠。 (3)考虑对恒河猴D负的妇女进行抗D预防,并接受手术流产,直到10(+0)周的妊娠。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号