首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Influence of amphetamine on recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats.
【24h】

Influence of amphetamine on recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats.

机译:苯丙胺对大鼠脑出血后恢复的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

d-amphetamine (AMP) paired with physical activity (e.g., beam walking) improves recovery after ischemic injury to the cortical motor system of rodents. We tested whether AMP promotes recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in rats. A moderate-sized ICH was produced by stereotaxically injecting collagenase into the striatum. Five days later rats were placed into either environmental enrichment cages (EE) or a control condition (group housing in standard cages) until euthanasia at 4 weeks post-ICH. Animals were injected with either AMP (2mg/kg i.p.) or sterile saline on days 7, 9 and 11 after ICH. Rats in EE also received training on beam (walking) and tray (skilled reaching) tasks 30min after each injection. Walking (beam and ladder task), skilled reaching (tray and staircase tasks) and neurological deficits (NDS) were repeatedly assessed. We predicted that EE would improve recovery and that AMP would further enhance it. Results showed that EE, but not AMP, significantly and consistently improved recovery on the beam and ladder task. Neither treatment significantly affected skilled reaching. Lesion volume was not significantly different among groups (overall average: 44.6mm(3) of tissue lost +/-15.3 S.D.). In conclusion, EE provides modest benefit for striatal ICH whereas AMP does not. This suggests that AMP will not provide substantial benefit to those patients with severe ICH affecting the basal ganglia.
机译:d-苯丙胺(AMP)与体力活动(例如束步运动)配合使用可提高对啮齿动物皮质运动系统缺血性损伤后的恢复能力。我们测试了AMP是否促进大鼠脑出血(ICH)后的恢复。通过将胶原酶立体定位注射到纹状体中产生中等大小的ICH。五天后,将大鼠置于环境富集笼(EE)或对照条件下(组在标准笼中),直到ICH后4周安乐死。在ICH后第7、9和11天给动物注射AMP(2mg / kg i.p.)或无菌盐水。每次注射30分钟后,EE中的大鼠也接受了有关横梁(行走)和托板(技能到达)任务的训练。反复评估步行(梁和梯子任务),熟练的伸手(托盘和楼梯任务)和神经功能缺损(NDS)。我们预测EE将改善恢复,而AMP将进一步增强恢复。结果表明,EE(而不是AMP)显着并持续改善了梁和梯子任务的恢复能力。两种治疗均未显着影响熟练的技术人员。各组之间的病变量没有显着差异(总体平均水平为44.6mm(3),组织损失+/- 15.3 S.D.)。总之,EE对纹状体ICH的疗效不高,而AMP则不。这表明AMP不会为那些患有严重ICH并影响基底神经节的患者带来实质性好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号