首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Current Procedural Terminology-based Procedure Categorization Enhances Cost Prediction of Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group in Spine Surgery
【24h】

Current Procedural Terminology-based Procedure Categorization Enhances Cost Prediction of Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group in Spine Surgery

机译:基于过程术语的过程分类增强了脊柱手术中Medicare严重诊断相关组的成本预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze how a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)-based categorization method can predict cost variation in surgical spine procedures. Summary of Background Data. Neck and back disorders affect a majority of the adult population and account for tens of billions of dollars in health care spending each year. In the era of bundled payments and value-based reimbursement, it is imperative for surgeons to identify sources of cost variability across surgical spine procedures. Historically, this has been accomplished using Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) codes, but they utilize an overly simplistic categorization of surgical procedures. The specificity and familiarity of the CPT coding structure makes it a better option for categorizing differences in surgical decision making and technique. Methods. Hospital billing data for patients undergoing a surgical spine procedure requiring an overnight, in-patient stay was retrospectively collected over 4 fiscal years (2012-2016) from a single health care system. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between cost variation and: spine-specific MS-DRG codes; a novel CPT-based categorization method; and the combination of MS-DRG codes and CPT-based categorization. Results. There were 5020 surgical procedures were analyzed with respect to 16 different MS-DRG codes and 30 distinct CPT-based surgical categories (CSCs). Linear regression results were: MS-DRG R-2 = 0.6545 (P < 0.001); CSC R-2 = 0.5709 (P < 0.001); and R-2 = 0.744 for the combined MS-DRG and CSC methods (P < 0.05). Median difference between the actual and predicted cost for the combined model was -$261.00, compared with -$727.50 for the CSC model and -$478.70 for the MS-DRG model. Conclusion. Addition of the CPT-based categorization method to MS-DRG coding provides an enhanced method to evaluate the association between predicted and actual cost when using linear regression analysis to assess cost variation in spine surgery.
机译:研究设计。回顾性队列研究。客观的本研究的目的是分析当前基于程序术语(CPT)的分类方法如何预测脊柱外科手术的成本变化。背景数据摘要。颈部和背部疾病影响到大多数成年人,每年在医疗保健支出中占数百亿美元。在捆绑支付和基于价值的报销的时代,外科医生必须确定脊柱外科手术中成本差异的来源。从历史上看,这是通过使用医疗保险严重性诊断相关组(MS-DRG)代码实现的,但它们使用了过于简单的外科手术分类。CPT编码结构的特异性和熟悉性使其成为区分手术决策和技术差异的更好选择。方法。对需要住院过夜的脊柱外科手术患者的医院账单数据进行了回顾性收集,收集时间为4个财政年度(2012-2016年),数据来自单一医疗系统。进行线性回归分析以评估成本变化与以下因素之间的相关性:脊柱特定MS-DRG编码;一种新的基于CPT的分类方法;以及MS-DRG编码和基于CPT的分类的结合。后果根据16种不同的MS-DRG代码和30种不同的基于CPT的手术类别(CSC),分析了5020种手术程序。线性回归结果为:MS-DRG R-2=0.6545(P<0.001);CSC R-2=0.5709(P<0.001);MS-DRG和CSC联合方法的R-2=0.744(P<0.05)。组合模型的实际成本和预测成本之间的中位数差异为-261.00美元,相比之下,CSC模型为-727.50美元,MS-DRG模型为-478.70美元。结论将基于CPT的分类方法添加到MS-DRG编码中,在使用线性回归分析评估脊柱手术成本变化时,提供了一种增强的方法来评估预测成本和实际成本之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号