首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Decreased dendritic spine density in posterodorsal medial amygdala neurons of proactive coping rats
【24h】

Decreased dendritic spine density in posterodorsal medial amygdala neurons of proactive coping rats

机译:在积极应激大鼠的后膜内侧杏仁型神经元中减少树突脊柱密度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are large individual differences in the way animals, including humans, behaviorally and physiologically cope with environmental challenges and opportunities. Rodents with either a proactive or reactive coping style not only differ in their capacity to adapt successfully to environmental conditions, but also have a differential susceptibility to develop stress-related (psycho)pathologies when coping fails. In this study, we explored if there are structural neuronal differences in spine density in brain regions important for the regulation of stress coping styles. For this, the individual coping styles of wild-type Groningen (WTG) rats were determined using their level of offensive aggressiveness assessed in the resident-intruder paradigm. Subsequently, brains from proactive (high-aggressive) and reactive (low-aggressive) rats were Golgi-cox stained for spine quantification. The results reveal that dendritic spine densities in the dorsal hippocampal CA1 region and basolateral amygdala are similar in rats with proactive and reactive coping styles. Interestingly, however, dendritic spine density in the medial amygdala (MeA) is strikingly reduced in the proactive coping rats. This brain region is reported to be strongly involved in rivalry aggression which is the criterion by which the coping styles in our study are dissociated. The possibility that structural differences in spine density in the MeA are involved in other behavioral traits of distinct coping styles needs further investigation.
机译:包括人类在内的动物在行为和生理上应对环境挑战和机遇的方式存在巨大的个体差异。具有主动或反应性应对方式的啮齿类动物不仅在成功适应环境条件的能力上存在差异,而且在应对失败时,对发展压力相关(心理)疾病的易感性也存在差异。在这项研究中,我们探讨了在对压力应对方式的调节非常重要的大脑区域,脊柱密度是否存在结构性神经元差异。为此,野生型Groningen(WTG)大鼠的个体应对方式是通过在常驻入侵者范式中评估其攻击性水平来确定的。随后,对主动(高攻击性)和反应(低攻击性)大鼠的大脑进行高尔基-考克斯染色,以进行脊柱量化。结果显示,在具有主动和反应性应对方式的大鼠中,背侧海马CA1区和基底外侧杏仁核的树突棘密度相似。然而,有趣的是,主动应对大鼠内侧杏仁核(MeA)的树突棘密度显著降低。据报道,这一大脑区域强烈参与竞争攻击,这是我们研究中分离应对方式的标准。MeA中脊柱密度的结构差异与不同应对方式的其他行为特征有关的可能性需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号