...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public mental health >Moving on: the BodyMind ApproachTM for medically unexplained symptoms
【24h】

Moving on: the BodyMind ApproachTM for medically unexplained symptoms

机译:继续前进:医学方法是医学上未解释的症状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to summarise practice-based evidence from an analysis of outcomes from a county-wide pilot study of a specialised primary care clinic employing an original approach for patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Conditions with persistent bodily symptoms for which tests and scans come back negative are termed MUS. Patients are generic, high health-utilising and for most there is no effective current treatment pathway. The solution is a proven service based on proof of concept, costeffectiveness and market research studies together with practice-based evidence from early adopters. The research was transferred from a university into a real-world primary care clinical service which has been delivering in two clinical commissioning groups in a large county in England. Design/methodology/approach – Clinical data calculated as reliable change from the various clinics were aggregated as practice-based evidence pre- and post-intervention via standardised measurements on anxiety, depression, symptom distress, functioning/activity, and wellbeing. It is not a research paper. Findings – At post-course the following percentages of people report reliable improvement when compared to pre-course: reductions in symptom distress 63 per cent (39/62), anxiety 42 per cent (13/31) and depression 35 per cent (11/31); increases in activity levels 58 per cent (18/31) and wellbeing 55 per cent (17/31) and 70 per cent felt that they had enough help to go forward resulting in the self-management of their symptoms which decreases the need to visit the GP or hospital. Research limitations/implications – Without a full clinical trial the outcomes must be interpreted with caution. There may be a possible Hawthorne or observer effect. Practical implications – Despite the small numbers who received this intervention, preliminary observations suggest it might offer a feasible alternative for many patients with MUS who reject, or try and find unsatisfying, cognitive behaviour therapy. Social implications – Many patients suffering MUS feel isolated and that they are the only one for whom their doctor cannot find an organic cause for their condition. The facilitated group has a beneficial effect on this problem, for example they feel a sense of belonging and sharing of their story. Originality/value – The BodyMind Approach is an original intervention mirroring the new wave of research in neuroscience and philosophy which prides embodiment perspectives over solely cognitive ones preferred in the "talking" therapies. There is a sea change in thinking about processes and models for supporting people with mental ill-health where the need to include the lived body experience is paramount to transformation.
机译:目的——本文的目的是总结基于实践的证据,这些证据来自对一家专门初级保健诊所的全县试点研究结果的分析,该诊所采用了一种针对医学原因不明症状(MUS)患者的原始方法。有持续性身体症状且检测和扫描结果为阴性的情况称为MUS。患者是普通的、高健康利用率的患者,大多数患者目前没有有效的治疗途径。该解决方案是基于概念证明、成本效益和市场研究以及早期采用者基于实践的证据的经验证的服务。这项研究从一所大学转移到一个真实的初级保健临床服务中,该服务已在英国一个大县的两个临床调试小组中提供。设计/方法/途径——通过对焦虑、抑郁、症状困扰、功能/活动和幸福感的标准化测量,将各诊所计算为可靠变化的临床数据汇总为干预前后基于实践的证据。这不是一篇研究论文。研究结果——与课程前相比,在课程后,以下百分比的人报告了可靠的改善:症状困扰减少63%(39/62),焦虑减少42%(13/31),抑郁减少35%(11/31);活动水平提高了58%(18/31),幸福感提高了55%(17/31),70%的人认为他们有足够的帮助继续前进,从而自我管理症状,减少了去看医生或医院的需要。研究限制/影响——如果没有完整的临床试验,必须谨慎解释结果。可能存在霍桑效应或观察者效应。实际意义——尽管接受这种干预的人数不多,但初步观察表明,它可能为许多拒绝认知行为疗法或试图找到不满意认知行为疗法的MUS患者提供可行的替代方案。社会影响——许多患有MUS的患者感到孤立无援,他们是唯一一个医生找不到导致他们病情的有机原因的人。促进小组在这个问题上有一个有益的影响,例如,他们感到归属感和分享他们的故事。独创性/价值——身心疗法是一种独创性干预,反映了神经科学和哲学领域的新一轮研究,它以体现观点而非“谈话”疗法中首选的认知观点为荣。对于支持精神疾病患者的过程和模式的思考发生了巨大的变化,在这些过程和模式中,需要包括生活的身体体验对转变至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号