...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of paediatrics and child health >Comparison of non-burn-specific systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and burn-specific American Burn Association systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in paediatric burned patients
【24h】

Comparison of non-burn-specific systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and burn-specific American Burn Association systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in paediatric burned patients

机译:非燃烧特异性全身性炎症反应综合征标准的比较和燃烧特异性美国烧伤协会的全身炎症反应综合征在儿科烧伤患者中的标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim We aim to investigate the diagnostic value of newly defined criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) for paediatric burn patients by the American Burn Association (ABA) by comparing the non-burn-specific SIRS criteria for children. Methods A total of 147 paediatric burn patients were included in this study. Patients diagnosed with sepsis were included in the sepsis group. Clinical parameters were obtained from the electronic medical records at the time of preliminary sepsis diagnosis. Both the non-burn-specific SIRS criteria and the burn-specific ABA SIRS criteria were applied to both the sepsis group and the non-sepsis group. Results Of 147 patients, 50 had sepsis according to the non-burn-specific sepsis criteria. When the 50-patient sepsis group was compared to the 97-patient non-sepsis group, the sepsis group had a significantly higher duration of hospitalisation, burn percentage, burn state and abbreviated burn scoring index (ABSI) (P < 0.05). The specificity of the two scales was 29.9% for the non-burn-specific SIRS and 74.2% for the burn-specific ABA SIRS. The sensitivity for the burn-specific ABA SIRS was calculated as 58%, the sensitivity for the non-burn-specific SIRS was 100%. While positive predictive value was calculated as 42.4% for the non-burn-specific SIRS, this value was found as 53.7% for the burn-specific ABA SIRS criteria. The correlation coefficient between the non-burn-specific SIRS and the burn-specific ABA SIRS was 0.378 (P < 0.001). Conclusions Our study underlines the need for widespread use of more specific and sensitive burn-specific clinical criteria to early diagnosis of infection in burn patients to prevent unnecessary antibiotic usage.
机译:目的通过比较美国烧伤协会(ABA)新定义的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准对儿童烧伤患者的诊断价值。方法对147例小儿烧伤患者进行研究。被诊断为败血症的患者被纳入败血症组。临床参数从初步脓毒症诊断时的电子病历中获得。脓毒症组和非脓毒症组均采用非烧伤特异性SIRS标准和烧伤特异性ABA SIRS标准。结果147例患者中,50例根据非烧伤特异性脓毒症标准发生脓毒症。当将50例脓毒症患者组与97例非脓毒症患者组进行比较时,脓毒症患者的住院时间、烧伤百分比、烧伤状态和简化烧伤评分指数(ABSI)显著高于非脓毒症患者组(P<0.05)。两个量表对非烧伤特异性SIRS的特异性为29.9%,对烧伤特异性ABA SIRS的特异性为74.2%。烧伤特异性ABA-SIRS的灵敏度计算为58%,非烧伤特异性SIRS的灵敏度为100%。非烧伤特异性SIRS的阳性预测值为42.4%,而烧伤特异性ABA SIRS标准的阳性预测值为53.7%。非烧伤特异性SIRS与烧伤特异性ABA-SIRS的相关系数为0.378(P<0.001)。结论我们的研究强调需要广泛使用更特异、更敏感的烧伤特异性临床标准,以早期诊断烧伤患者感染,防止不必要的抗生素使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号