...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastrointestinal cancer. >Prognostic Significance of VEGF and HIF-1 alpha in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Sorafenib Versus Metformin Sorafenib Combination
【24h】

Prognostic Significance of VEGF and HIF-1 alpha in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Sorafenib Versus Metformin Sorafenib Combination

机译:VEGF和HIF-1α在肝细胞癌患者接受Sorafenib与二甲双胍组合组合的预后意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem. HCC burden has been increasing in Egypt in the past 10 years. Most HCC cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage with limited treatment options. Sorafenib is the standard therapy for advanced HCC, but the effectiveness is not satisfied. Metformin may decrease the risk of HCC development in diabetic patients, reduces tumor invasion, and augments sensitivity to sorafenib; however, safety and efficacy of combined treatment are still unclear. As HCC is characterized by high vascularity, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in vascularization, many studies questioned if VEGF and HIF-1 alpha could offer information about HCC response to sorafenib. We conducted this study to assess the benefits from adding metformin to HCC treatment, and appraise the role of VEGF and HIF-1 alpha in HCC prognosis. Method This was a prospective, randomized study in which 80 advanced measurable patients consecutively treated with sorafenib plus metformin (arm A) or sorafenib alone (arm B), prognostic value of plasma, and tissue levels of VEGF and HIF-1 alpha were evaluated. Results We enrolled 61 men and 19 women with a median age of 60 years (range 49-68 years). Fifty-seven patients had Child-Pugh A while 23 had early B, the most common etiology of liver disease was hepatitis C (86%). Sixty percent of patients were diabetic. No significant difference was detected between arm A and arm B regarding response to treatment (p = 0.5), time to disease progression (p = 0.3), or overall survival (p = 0.6). Low VEGF and HIF-1 alpha plasma levels were significantly associated with better treatment response (p < 0.001 for both), and higher OS (p < 0.001). Patients with high expressions of VEGF and HIF in HCC tissue had significantly poor treatment outcome (p < 0.001, p = 0.03, respectively), and poor OS (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions No superior efficacy of adding metformin to sorafenib in HCC treatment. VEGF and HIF-1 alpha had promising prognostic value in HCC.
机译:背景肝细胞癌(HCC)是一个主要的健康问题。在过去10年中,埃及的肝癌负担一直在增加。大多数肝癌患者在晚期诊断,治疗选择有限。索拉非尼是晚期肝癌的标准治疗方法,但疗效并不令人满意。二甲双胍可降低糖尿病患者发生肝癌的风险,减少肿瘤侵袭,并增加对索拉非尼的敏感性;然而,联合治疗的安全性和有效性仍不清楚。由于HCC的特点是高血管密度,而血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在血管化中起着重要作用,许多研究质疑VEGF和HIF-1α是否能提供有关HCC对索拉非尼反应的信息。我们进行这项研究是为了评估在肝癌治疗中加入二甲双胍的益处,并评估VEGF和HIF-1α在肝癌预后中的作用。方法这是一项前瞻性随机研究,其中80名晚期可测量患者连续接受索拉非尼联合二甲双胍(a组)或索拉非尼单独(B组)治疗,评估血浆的预后价值,以及VEGF和HIF-1α的组织水平。结果我们招募了61名男性和19名女性,中位年龄为60岁(49-68岁)。57名患者患有Child-Pugh A,23名患者患有早期B,最常见的肝病病因是丙型肝炎(86%)。60%的患者患有糖尿病。在治疗反应(p=0.5)、疾病进展时间(p=0.3)或总生存率(p=0.6)方面,A组和B组之间未检测到显著差异。低VEGF和HIF-1α血浆水平与更好的治疗反应(两者均p<0.001)和更高的OS(p<0.001)显著相关。肝癌组织中VEGF和HIF高表达的患者治疗效果显著差(分别为p<0.001,p=0.03),OS差(分别为p<0.001,p<0.001)。结论索拉非尼联合二甲双胍治疗肝癌无明显疗效。VEGF和HIF-1α在HCC中具有良好的预后价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号