首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geriatric oncology >Chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in elderly versus non-elderly cancer patients: Patterns, outcomes, and determinants (MONITOR-GCSF study)
【24h】

Chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in elderly versus non-elderly cancer patients: Patterns, outcomes, and determinants (MONITOR-GCSF study)

机译:化疗诱导的(发热)中性粒细胞源性缺乏生物纤维单粒细胞群与老年人对非老年癌症患者:模式,结果和决定因素(MONITION-GCSF研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Myelotoxic chemotherapy is associated with chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia (CIN/FN). The MONITOR-GCSF study evaluated biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio?) prophylaxis patterns, associated outcomes, and determinants. We performed stratified analyses comparing elderly and non-elderly patients. Methods Comparative (elderly/non-elderly) analysis of demographics and clinical status, prophylaxis, associated CIN/FN outcomes (CIN grade 4 [CIN4], FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalizations and chemodisturbances, composite), and, per hierarchical modeling, determinants thereof evaluated at the patient- and cycle-level. Results There were no significant differences between both cohorts in prophylaxis initiation/duration and associated outcomes, but proportionately more elderly patients were correctly-prophylacted and fewer over-prophylacted. Common determinants of poor CIN/FN outcomes included concomitant antibiotic prophylaxis, impaired performance status, and any grade CIN in a previous cycle, whereas common determinants of good outcomes included over-prophylaxis and prophylaxis initiation within 24–72 h. In the elderly, female gender, liver/renal/cardiovascular disease, secondary prophylaxis, and under-prophylaxis were associated with poorer outcomes. In the non-elderly, CIN4 at baseline or in a prior cycle was associated with poorer CIN/FN outcomes, and higher biosimilar filgrastim dose and, perhaps counter-intuitively, under-prophylaxis with better outcomes. Conclusion Adequate GCSF support is essential for all patients, but especially for elderly patients with serious chronic disease, certainly, if concomitant antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated and if a CIN4 episode occurred in a prior cycle. The potential impact of impaired performance status, especially ECOG ≥ 2 at chemotherapy start or a worsening to such during chemotherapy; under-prophylaxis, including inadequate secondary prophylaxis, should be considered in elderly patients. Timely GCSF initiation and over-prophylaxis is associated with lower rates of adverse CIN/FN events in elderly and non-elderly patients, and should be further evaluated in prospective randomized trials.
机译:摘要背景骨髓毒性化疗与化疗诱导(发热)的中性粒细胞减少症(CIN/FN)有关。MONITOR-GCSF研究评估了生物仿制药非格拉斯汀(Zarzio?)预防模式、相关结果和决定因素。我们对老年患者和非老年患者进行了分层分析。方法对人口统计学和临床状况、预防措施、相关CIN/FN结果(CIN 4级[CIN4]、FN、CIN/FN相关住院和化疗紊乱综合)进行对比分析(老年人/非老年人),并根据分层模型,在患者和周期水平上评估其决定因素。结果两组患者在预防开始/持续时间和相关结果方面无显著差异,但相应地,老年患者正确预防的比例更高,过度预防的比例更低。CIN/FN预后不良的常见决定因素包括同时使用抗生素预防、表现受损状态和前一周期任何级别的CIN,而良好预后的常见决定因素包括过度预防和24-72小时内开始预防。在老年人、女性、肝脏/肾脏/心血管疾病、二级预防、,预防不足与较差的预后相关。在非老年人中,基线检查时或前一个周期的CIN4与较低的CIN/FN结果相关,与较高的生物仿制药费格拉司汀剂量相关,并且可能与直觉相反,在预防治疗下具有更好的结果。结论充分的GCSF支持对所有患者来说都是必要的,尤其是对于患有严重慢性病的老年患者,如果需要同时进行抗生素预防,并且在前一个周期中发生了CIN4发作,这是肯定的。绩效状态受损的潜在影响,尤其是ECOG≥ 2.化疗开始或化疗期间病情恶化;老年患者应考虑预防不足,包括二级预防不足。在老年和非老年患者中,及时启动GCSF和过度预防与较低的CIN/FN不良事件发生率相关,应在前瞻性随机试验中进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号