首页> 外文期刊>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] >Shear bond strength of glass ionomer and resin-based cements to different types of zirconia
【24h】

Shear bond strength of glass ionomer and resin-based cements to different types of zirconia

机译:玻璃离聚物和树脂水泥的剪切粘合强度与不同类型的氧化锆

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a glass ionomer (GI) cement, an 10-methacryloyloxy-decyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based adhesive resin cement (MDP-based AC), an MDP-based self-adhesive resin cement (MDP-based SAC), an MDP-free self-adhesive resin cement (MDP-free SAC), and a resin-modified GI (RMGI) cement to a 3 mol% yttria-stabilized (3Y-TZP) and a 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ). Materials and methods Fifty blocks were produced using 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ, assigned to subgroups based on the five cements investigated (n= 10) and luted to cylindrical specimens of the same substrate. Each specimen was loaded in a SBS apparatus to failure. Mean SBS (MPa) values and standard deviations were calculated. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests (alpha= .05). Failed specimens were subjected to fractographic analysis. Results MDP-based AC and MDP-based SAC cements displayed the highest SBS values with both the substrates; GI cement showed the lowest. RMGI and MDP-free SAC cements performed better with 3Y-TZP than with 5Y-PSZ. Fractographic analysis revealed only adhesive and mixed failures. Conclusions MDP-based AC and MDP-based SAC cements are suitable for both 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ. MDP-free SAC and RMGI cements are adequate choices for 3Y-TZP, but seem less effective with 5Y-PSZ. Clinical significance MDP-based SACs appear to be as reliable as MDP-based ACs for both 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ cementation. Specifically, for 5Y-PSZ cementation, resin-based MDP-free SACs do not seem to guarantee predictable results in terms of SBS.
机译:目的研究玻璃离子水门汀(GI)、10-甲基丙烯酰氧基癸基磷酸二氢钠(MDP)基粘接树脂水门汀(MDP-based AC)、MDP基自粘树脂水门汀(MDP-based SAC)、无MDP自粘树脂水门汀(MDP-free SAC)的剪切粘结强度(SBS),以及一种树脂改性GI(RMGI)水泥,其为3 mol%钇稳定(3Y-TZP)和5 mol%钇部分稳定氧化锆(5Y-PSZ)。材料和方法使用3Y-TZP和5Y-PSZ制作50个试块,根据所研究的五种水泥(n=10)分为亚组,并将其稀释到相同基质的圆柱形试样上。将每个试样加载到SBS装置中,以防止其失效。计算平均SBS(MPa)值和标准偏差。数据分析采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验(α=0.05)。对失效试样进行断口分析。结果MDP基AC和MDP基SAC水泥在两种基质中的SBS值最高;GI水泥显示最低。与5Y-PSZ相比,3Y-TZP组的RMGI和无MDP SAC水泥的性能更好。断口分析显示,只有粘合和混合故障。结论MDP基AC和MDP基SAC水泥适用于3Y-TZP和5Y-PSZ。对于3Y-TZP,无MDP的SAC和RMGI水泥是足够的选择,但对于5Y-PSZ似乎效果较差。临床意义对于3Y-TZP和5Y-PSZ胶结,基于MDP的SAC似乎与基于MDP的ACs一样可靠。具体而言,对于5Y-PSZ胶结,基于树脂的无MDP SAC似乎不能保证SBS的可预测结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号