首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Cost Analysis of Initial Treatment With Endovascular Revascularization, Open Surgery, or Primary Major Amputation in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease
【24h】

Cost Analysis of Initial Treatment With Endovascular Revascularization, Open Surgery, or Primary Major Amputation in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

机译:血管内血运重建,开放手术或外周血疾病患者初级截肢的初始治疗成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the total initial treatment costs for open surgery, endovascular revascularization, and primary major amputation within a single-payer healthcare system. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis was undertaken to evaluate 1138 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) who underwent 1017 endovascular procedures, 86 open surgeries, and 35 major amputations between 2013 and 2016. A cost-mix analysis was performed on individual patient data generated for selected diagnosis-related groups. Mean costs are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: There was no intergroup difference in demographics or private health insurance status. However, the amputation group had a higher proportion of emergency procedures (68.6% vs 13.3% vs 27.9%, p 0.00l) and critical limb ischemia (88.6% vs 35.9% vs 37.2%, p 0.00l) compared with the endovascular therapy and open surgery groups, respectively. The endovascular revascularization group spent less time in hospital and used fewer intensive care unit (ICU) resources compared with the open surgery and major amputation groups (hospital length of stay: 3.4 vs 10.0 vs 20.2 days, p 0.01; ICU: 2.4 vs 22.6 vs 54.6 hours, p 0.01), respectively. While mean prosthetic and device costs were higher in the endovascular group [AUD$2770 vs AUD$1658 (open) and AUD$1219 (amputation), p 0.01], substantial disparities were observed in costs associated with longer operating theater times, length of stay, and ICU utilization, which resulted in significantly higher costs in the open and amputation groups. After adjusting for confounders, the AUD$18,396 (95% CI AUD$16,436 to AUD$20,356) mean cost per admission for the endovascular revascularization group was significantly less (p 0.001) than the open surgery (AUD$31,908, 95% CI AUD$28,285 to AUD$35,530) and major amputation groups (AUD$43,033, 95% CI AUD$37,706 to AUD$48,361). Conclusion: Endovascular revascularization procedures for PAD cost the health payer less compared with open surgery and primary amputation. While devices used to deliver contemporary endovascular therapy are more expensive, the reduction in bed days, ICU utilization, and related hospital resources results in a significantly lower mean total cost per admission for the initial treatment.
机译:目的:比较单一付费医疗系统中开放手术、血管内血运重建和主要截肢的初始治疗总成本。方法:对1138例症状性外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者进行多中心回顾性分析,这些患者在2013年至2016年间接受了1017次血管内手术、86次开放手术和35次大截肢。对为选定的诊断相关组生成的单个患者数据进行成本组合分析。平均成本以95%置信区间(CI)表示。结果:在人口统计学或私人医疗保险状况方面没有组间差异。然而,与血管内治疗组和开放手术组相比,截肢组的急诊手术比例(68.6%比13.3%比27.9%,p;0.00l)和严重肢体缺血比例(88.6%比35.9%比37.2%,p;0.00l)更高。与开放手术组和主要截肢组相比,血管内血运重建组住院时间更少,使用的重症监护室(ICU)资源更少(住院时间:3.4天对10.0天对20.2天,p;0.01;ICU:2.4天对22.6小时对54.6小时,p;0.01)。虽然血管内治疗组的平均假肢和设备成本较高[2770澳元对1658澳元(开放式)和1219澳元(截肢),p;0.01],但在与更长的手术时间、住院时间和ICU利用率相关的成本方面观察到了显著差异,这导致开放式和截肢治疗组的成本显著较高。在对混杂因素进行调整后,血管内血运重建组的18396澳元(95%可信区间16436澳元至20356澳元)平均每次入院费用显著低于开放手术组(31908澳元,95%可信区间28285澳元至35530澳元)和主要截肢组(43033澳元,95%可信区间37706澳元至48361澳元)。结论:与开放手术和一期截肢相比,PAD血管内血运重建术的医疗费用更低。虽然用于提供当代血管内治疗的设备更昂贵,但病床天数、ICU利用率和相关医院资源的减少导致初次治疗的平均每次入院总成本显著降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号