首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Definition of Type II Endoleak Risk Based on Preoperative Anatomical Characteristics
【24h】

Definition of Type II Endoleak Risk Based on Preoperative Anatomical Characteristics

机译:基于术前解剖特征的II型胚胎风险的定义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To define the risk for type II endoleak (EII) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) based on preoperative anatomical characteristics. Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2015, 189 patients (mean age 78.4 +/- 7.6 years; 165 men) underwent standard EVAR. Mean aneurysm diameter was 5.7 +/- 0.7 cm and mean volume 125.2 +/- 45.8 cm(3). Patients were assigned to the at-risk group (n=123, 65%) when at least one of the following criteria was present: patency of a >3-mm inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), patency of at least 3 pairs of lumbar arteries, or patency of 2 pairs of lumbar arteries and a sacral artery or accessory renal artery or any diameter patent IMA; otherwise, patients were entered in the 'low-risk" group (n=66, 35%). EII rates and freedom from EII reintervention were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. Preoperative clinical and anatomical characteristics were evaluated for their association with EII and EII reinterventions using multiple logistic regression analysis; results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Freedom from endoleak was lower in the at-risk group compared with the low-risk group at 36 months after EVAR (p=0.04). Freedom from EII-related reinterventions was significantly lower in the at-risk group (80% vs 100%, p=0.001) at 48 months. Based on the multiple regression analysis, the at-risk group had a higher likelihood of both EII (OR 9.91, 95% CI 2.92 to 33.72, p<0.001) and EII-related reinterventions (OR 9.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 78.44, p=0.04). These criteria had 89.4% (95% CI 83.9% to 93.2%) sensitivity and 48.0% (95% CI 40.7% to 55.3%) specificity for EII; sensitivity and specificity for EII reintervention were 100% (95% CI 93.8% to 100%) and 38.8% (95% CI 31.9% to 46.2%). Within the at-risk group, a sac thrombus volume <35% was an additional predictor for both EII (OR 5.21, 95% CI 1.75 to 15.47, p=0.003) and EII-related reinterventions (OR 8.33, 95% CI 2.20 to 31.51, p<0.002). Conclusion: The selection criteria effectively discriminated between low-risk patients and patients at risk for EII and associated reinterventions. A thrombus volume <35% was an additional predictor for EII and EII-related reintervention among patients at risk. These criteria may be useful for preemptively selecting patients who may benefit from EII prevention procedures or a more aggressive surveillance protocol.
机译:目的:根据术前解剖特征确定血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)后II型内漏(EII)的风险。方法:2008年1月至2015年12月,189名患者(平均年龄78.4+/-7.6岁;165名男性)接受了标准EVAR。平均动脉瘤直径为5.7+/-0.7厘米,平均体积为125.2+/-45.8厘米(3)。当至少存在以下标准之一时,患者被分配到高危组(n=123,65%):肠系膜下动脉(IMA)通畅度>3mm,至少3对腰动脉通畅,或2对腰动脉和骶动脉或副肾动脉通畅,或任何直径的IMA通畅;否则患者被纳入“低风险”组(n=66,35%)。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较EII率和EII再干预的自由度。使用多元逻辑回归分析评估术前临床和解剖学特征与EII和EII再干预的相关性;结果以优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示结果:在EVAR后36个月,与低风险组相比,高风险组的内漏自由度较低(p=0.04)。在48个月时,高危组的EII相关再干预自由度显著降低(80%对100%,p=0.001)。基于多元回归分析,高危人群出现EII(OR 9.91,95%可信区间2.92至33.72,p<0.001)和EII相关再干预(OR 9.11,95%可信区间1.06至78.44,p=0.04)的可能性较高。这些标准对EII的敏感性为89.4%(95%CI为83.9%-93.2%),特异性为48.0%(95%CI为40.7%-55.3%);EII再干预的敏感性和特异性分别为100%(95%可信区间93.8%-100%)和38.8%(95%可信区间31.9%-46.2%)。在高危组中,sac血栓体积<35%是EII(OR 5.21,95%CI 1.75至15.47,p=0.003)和EII相关再干预(OR 8.33,95%CI 2.20至31.51,p<0.002)的额外预测因子。结论:选择标准有效地区分了EII和相关再干预的低风险患者和风险患者。血栓体积<35%是高危患者EII和EII相关再干预的额外预测因子。这些标准可能有助于先发制人地选择可能受益于EII预防程序或更积极的监测方案的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号