首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied microbiology >Reevaluating limits of detection of 12 lateral flow immunoassays for the detection ofYersinia pestis,Francisella tularensis, andBacillus anthracisspores using viable risk group-3 strains
【24h】

Reevaluating limits of detection of 12 lateral flow immunoassays for the detection ofYersinia pestis,Francisella tularensis, andBacillus anthracisspores using viable risk group-3 strains

机译:使用可行性风险组-3菌株检测对植物胰岛素,Francisella Tulartensis,Andbacillus Anthracisspores的检测的重新检测12次横向流动免疫测定的限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim Rapid detection of biological agents in biodefense is critical for operational, tactical and strategic levels as well as for medical countermeasures.Yersinia pestis,Francisella tularensis,andBacillus anthracisare high priority agents of biological warfare or bioterrorism and many response forces use lateral flow assays (LFAs) for their detection. Several companies produce these assays, which offer results in short time and are easy to use. Despite their importance, only few publications on the limits of detection (LOD) for LFAs are available. Most of these studies used inactivated bacteria or risk group-2 strains. As the inactivation process in previous studies might have affected the tests' performances, it was our aim in this study to determine and compare the LOD of several commercially available LFAs using viable risk group-3 strains. Methods and Results Lateral flow assays from four different companies for the detection of following bacteria were evaluated:Y. pestis, F. tularensisandB. anthracisspores. Two independent quantification methods for each target organism were applied, in order to ensure high quantification accuracy. LODs varied greatly between tests and organisms and ranged between 10(4)forY. pestis-tests and as high as >10(9)for oneB. anthracis-test. Conclusion This work precisely determined the LODs of LFAs from four commercial suppliers. The herein determined LODs differed from results of previous studies. This illustrates the need for using accurately quantified viable risk group 3-strains for determining such LODs. Significance and Impact of the Study Our work bridges an important knowledge gap with regard to LFA LOD. The LODs determined in this study will facilitate better assessment of LFA-results. They illustrate that a negative LFA result is not suited to exclude the presence of the respective agent in the analyzed sample.
机译:目的生物防御中生物制剂的快速检测对作战、战术和战略水平以及医疗对策至关重要。鼠疫耶尔森菌、土拉伦弗朗西斯菌和炭疽杆菌是生物战或生物恐怖主义的高优先级病原体,许多反应部队使用横向流动分析(LFA)进行检测。有几家公司生产这些分析方法,它们可以在短时间内提供结果,并且易于使用。尽管它们很重要,但关于LFA检测限(LOD)的出版物很少。这些研究大多使用灭活细菌或风险组2菌株。由于之前研究中的失活过程可能会影响试验的性能,因此我们在本研究中的目的是确定和比较几种商用LFA的LOD,使用可行的风险组3菌株。方法和结果对来自四家不同公司的检测以下细菌的横向流动分析进行了评估:鼠疫耶尔森菌、图拉伦西斯菌和B。炭疽孢子。为确保高定量准确度,对每个目标生物体采用了两种独立的定量方法。检测和生物体之间的LOD差异很大,范围在10(4)福里之间。鼠疫检测,oneB的检测结果高达>10(9)。炭疽试验。结论这项工作精确地确定了四家商业供应商的LFA的LOD。本文确定的LOD与之前研究的结果不同。这说明需要使用准确量化的可行风险组3菌株来确定此类LOD。研究的意义和影响我们的工作弥合了关于LFA LOD的重要知识鸿沟。本研究中确定的LOD将有助于更好地评估LFA结果。它们表明,负LFA结果不适合排除分析样品中存在的相应试剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号