首页> 外文期刊>Journal of criminal psychology >Anger following provocation in individuals with psychopathic traits
【24h】

Anger following provocation in individuals with psychopathic traits

机译:愤怒在患有精神疗养特征的个体挑衅后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to test the attenuated-anger and heightened-anger hypotheses of psychopathy by assessing the physiological, behavioral, and subjective measures of anger in individuals with and without psychopathic traits. Design/methodology/approach - In all, 62 male college students were assigned to one of three groups based on evidence of elevated affective-interpersonal (Factor 1) and antisocial lifestyle (Factor 2) traits associated with psychopathy (the IF1+F2 group), evidence of only Factor 2 traits (the F2 only group), or based on the absence of psychopathic traits (the control group), using Gough's (1957) Socialization scale and a modified, interview only form of Hare's (1991) Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. To induce anger, participants received unjust criticism about their performance on a computer-based affective lexical decision task and were denied a performance bonus they had reason to expect. Findings - Following provocation, the three groups displayed similar increases in blood pressure, pulse, and self-reported anger. The control and IF1+F2 groups also displayed similar retaliation toward the confederate. However, the IF1+F2 group displayed smaller increases on two of three measures of facial muscle activity associated with anger. Originality/value - This study is one of the first to assess anger responsiveness in individuals with psychopathic traits using a powerful anger induction and using physiological, behavioral, and subjective indices of anger. It is also the first to assess both the attenuated-anger and the heightened-anger hypotheses of psychopathy. The findings appear largely inconsistent with both perspectives.
机译:目的——本论文的目的是通过评估具有和不具有精神病特征的个体的愤怒生理、行为和主观测量,来检验精神病的愤怒减弱和愤怒增强假说。设计/方法/方法——总共有62名男大学生根据与精神病相关的情感人际关系(因素1)和反社会生活方式(因素2)特征升高的证据(IF1+F2组)、仅因素2特征的证据(仅F2组)或不存在精神病特征的证据(对照组)被分配到三个组中的一个,使用Gough(1957年)的社会化量表和Hare(1991年)修订的精神病检查表的修订版,仅限于访谈。为了引起愤怒,参与者在基于计算机的情感词汇决策任务中的表现受到了不公正的批评,并且没有得到他们有理由期望的表现奖励。研究结果——在受到刺激后,这三组人的血压、脉搏和自我报告的愤怒程度都有类似的增加。对照组和IF1+F2组也对邦联表现出类似的报复。然而,IF1+F2组在与愤怒相关的三项面部肌肉活动指标中,有两项表现出较小的增加。原创性/价值——这项研究是第一次使用强大的愤怒诱导和生理、行为和主观愤怒指数来评估具有心理变态特征的个体的愤怒反应性。这也是第一次评估精神病的愤怒减弱和愤怒加剧假说。研究结果似乎与这两种观点基本不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号